Search found 4993 matches

Go to advanced search

by triplus
Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:05 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Porting to python3
Replies: 348
Views: 26653

Re: Porting to python3

Hi @CADennis. Web hosting we use doesn't offer us much in this regard. And there is the problem of capable system administrators being involved that would take care of building and maintaining the infrastructure. And if all that would get done the way i understand it what is actually needed ATM is m...
by triplus
Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:49 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Bugtracker recent changes
Replies: 41
Views: 673

Re: Bugtracker recent changes

OK therefore critical security issue was fixed (as we use 2.3.1). Attacker shouldn't be able to reset passwords remotely any more. As administrators don't have access to other user/administrator passwords? Then i guess we need to assume attacker has password of one of the administrator accounts as J...
by triplus
Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:40 pm
Forum: TechDraw
Topic: First test drive ...
Replies: 25
Views: 736

Re: First test drive ...

Note that on Ubuntu 17.04 i have 2 dev builds. One is against Qt 4 and one against Qt 5. And the Qt 5 build has the behaviour when the pop-up stays persistent. Qt 4 build doesn't have such behaviour and everything works as expected.
by triplus
Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:21 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Bugtracker recent changes
Replies: 41
Views: 673

Re: Bugtracker recent changes

Are passwords saved in the backup and they get restored from the backup? As if that happens and the breach happened i feel that attacker has the password of all the users. Especially the users with some administration powers therefore must change the password in some coordinated way. For the attacke...
by triplus
Tue Apr 25, 2017 3:08 pm
Forum: UX/UI Design
Topic: Request for collaboration: Creating a visual flow chart for reporting bugs
Replies: 42
Views: 1532

Re: Request for collaboration: Creating a visual flow chart for reporting bugs

Nice to see the whole process from the initial idea to putting the contribution in use is now achieved.
by triplus
Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:36 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: PD NEXT: Mapping change and support
Replies: 22
Views: 407

Re: PD NEXT: Mapping change and support

DeepSOIC wrote:
triplus wrote:
abdullah wrote:In any case, I deem unacceptable to silently ignore a wrong support. FreeCAD should do something.


Exclamation mark in the tree view suggesting feature has a wrong support?
It used to do that in past. It looks like it's broken.


@abdullah

I guess you have just found a bug!
by triplus
Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:32 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Sketcher mini-features
Replies: 60
Views: 1306

Re: Sketcher mini-features

Well in my workflow (maybe my pulse trembles too much), DeepSOIC's idea makes sense. I was thinking only for non-continue mode (only for the traditional select+click button or hit key, which is what I mostly use). If I have to think of hitting shift, wait no it was ctrl, lets look at the status bar...
by triplus
Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:48 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: PD NEXT: Mapping change and support
Replies: 22
Views: 407

Re: PD NEXT: Mapping change and support

abdullah wrote:In any case, I deem unacceptable to silently ignore a wrong support. FreeCAD should do something.


Exclamation mark in the tree view suggesting feature has a wrong support?
by triplus
Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:33 pm
Forum: UX/UI Design
Topic: Request for collaboration: Creating a visual flow chart for reporting bugs
Replies: 42
Views: 1532

Re: Request for collaboration: Creating a visual flow chart for reporting bugs

Hi @chrisb. I feel that changing the existing chart can always be done in the future if it will make sense. As for putting the chart in use. Just add your contribution here: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5236 As a new reply. And if you have Wiki editing rights find a good spot...
by triplus
Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:07 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Sketcher mini-features
Replies: 60
Views: 1306

Re: Sketcher mini-features

My was after one specific use-case where eliminating pop-up by doing a reasonable thing was proposed. But this follow up proposal is way more aggressive I don't see how it is more aggressive. It still eliminates the pop-up, it still does something reasonable (and I think way more reasonable than ma...

Go to advanced search