Search found 25 matches

by Groguigui
Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:41 pm
Forum: FEM
Topic: Element Membrane M3D6
Replies: 15
Views: 5864

Re: ERROR : too many cutbacks

So I would expect non zero normal stresses on your shell elements. And you're right! Plane stress (or plane strain) needs special element types which can be used only on 2D model in xy plane in Calculix. I understand, that is why I have non zero normal stresses, because applied pressure is normal o...
by Groguigui
Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:34 am
Forum: FEM
Topic: Element Membrane M3D6
Replies: 15
Views: 5864

Re: ERROR : too many cutbacks

Yes Bernd, I saw, but I think isn't possible to set cutback in FreeCAD. Anyway, actually I have another problem. :lol: Do you know why FreeCAD solve a stress in third dimension when we use a shell element? Usually, it must be zero with plane stress hypothesis. Actually I would like to solve a hypere...
by Groguigui
Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:28 am
Forum: FEM
Topic: Element Membrane M3D6
Replies: 15
Views: 5864

Re: ERROR : too many cutbacks

Thanks,

Finally, I found how solve my problem : I used *Controls fonction to set increments and cutbacks. :P
http://web.mit.edu/calculix_v2.7/Calcul ... de179.html
by Groguigui
Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:19 am
Forum: FEM
Topic: Element Membrane M3D6
Replies: 15
Views: 5864

Element Membrane M3D6

Hi, I would like to simulate a spherical shell with internal pressure, like a ball, with hyperelastic material (Neo Hooke and Yeoh), to compare with analytical solution. But the model never converges, always for same reason : "*ERROR : too many cutbacks best solution and residuals are in the fr...
by Groguigui
Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:35 am
Forum: FEM
Topic: Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff stress?
Replies: 2
Views: 1531

Re: Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff stress?

Thanks Sodelo, Guido is really the best guy to answer your questions. He is obviously very good in his field. I have already ordered his book. ;) Could you please describe your reference solution and how you want to simulate it with Calculix? What do you mean by "reference solution"? To si...
by Groguigui
Mon Apr 03, 2017 1:22 pm
Forum: FEM
Topic: Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff stress?
Replies: 2
Views: 1531

Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff stress?

Version 0.17 10460 2017/03/08 Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS 64-bit master 91c59c7910436c44ede608e29d9a90a287121a11 Hi everybody, I would like to develop some hyperelastic incompressible models with calculix in my laboratory, but before this, it is necessary to test calculix. For this, I do some simple cases l...
by Groguigui
Mon Apr 03, 2017 12:39 pm
Forum: Forum français
Topic: Contraintes de Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff?
Replies: 1
Views: 781

Contraintes de Cauchy ou Piola-Kirchoff?

Version 0.17 10460 2017/03/08 Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS 64-bit master 91c59c7910436c44ede608e29d9a90a287121a11 Bonjour à tous, Dans le but de bosser en hyperélasticité (en modifiant l'INP à la main), on teste actuellement Calculix (via FreeCAD) en le comparant à des cas simples. On remarque qu'en 3D, trac...
by Groguigui
Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:56 pm
Forum: Install / Compile
Topic: Wich version for FEM shell development?
Replies: 14
Views: 5421

Re: Wich version for FEM shell development?

Ok, thank you very much.

I hadn't understood!
by Groguigui
Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:25 pm
Forum: Install / Compile
Topic: Wich version for FEM shell development?
Replies: 14
Views: 5421

Re: Wich version for FEM shell development?

Thank you Bernd! :P For example, if I mesh Shape, Shape001 and Face001 with your file, and after that I apply some boundaries conditions (like FemConstraintFixe and FemConstraintForce) when I write inp.file in mechanical analysis, nothing happen. Only : check dependencies. You too? Is it possible to...
by Groguigui
Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:03 pm
Forum: Install / Compile
Topic: Wich version for FEM shell development?
Replies: 14
Views: 5421

Re: Wich version for FEM shell development?

Thanks, Bernd, your link was interesting but it doesn't answer about my question 4). May be I'm blind (or not enough good in english :lol: )! Now, if to mesh a simple surface 2D with draft in FreeCAD is impossible in 0.16 Version, I'm doing a mesh a imported complex surface without problem in a same...