FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

About the development of the FEM module/workbench.

Moderator: bernd

User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by bernd »

I'm gone make one for the mesh region object soon, hopefully. I could include this changes. This way it is much easier for the maintainer (Yorik and Werner). How about this?
User avatar
makkemal
Posts: 395
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 12:41 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by makkemal »

Yes no problem, we are this was for easy-fc we are more concerned with linearised stresses
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by bernd »

makkemal wrote:we are more concerned with linearised stresses
Ahh yes I still would like to have a look at this one too.
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by bernd »

bernd wrote:
makkemal wrote:we are more concerned with linearised stresses
Ahh yes I still would like to have a look at this one too.
linearised stress and heat_flux rebases on master and compiles on debian jessie. I integrated in my latest development branch I'm gone use for my next Pull Reques. I may gone post at linerised stress topic after testing. See
https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion

BTW: another 20 commits for FEM. :shock: :)
User avatar
easyw-fc
Veteran
Posts: 3633
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:34 am

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by easyw-fc »

bernd wrote:See
https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion

BTW: another 20 commits for FEM. :shock: :)
thx a lot!
Great sw! Great Team! :D
User avatar
sgrogan
Veteran
Posts: 6499
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by sgrogan »

A win test build (direct download link) https://github.com/sgrogan/FreeCAD/rele ... 64build.7z
bernd wrote:linearised stress and heat_flux rebases on master and compiles on debian jessie. I integrated in my latest development branch I'm gone use for my next Pull Request.
Thanks for the "one stop testing"
The pace of FEM development is amazing! Do you guys sleep?
EDIT:
I get some self test errors, they are also in master 0.16.9175. Let me know if you need the details. Don't know why appveyor isn't complaining?
"fight the good fight"
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by bernd »

sgrogan wrote:I get some self test errors, they are also in master 0.16.9175. Let me know if you need the details. Don't know why appveyor isn't complaining?
No self test errors here neither on FreeCAD master

OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.17.9175 (Git)
Build type: Unknown
Branch: master
Hash: 26e1a24060df702816e9561b8473bd3fb41825e2
Python version: 2.7.9
Qt version: 4.8.6
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.0.0

nor on my development branch

OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.17.9195 (Git)
Build type: Unknown
Branch: femmeshregion
Hash: dd4fd3a218d1e7cfe7025d7c776386b6905766d3
Python version: 2.7.9
Qt version: 4.8.6
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.0.0
User avatar
sgrogan
Veteran
Posts: 6499
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by sgrogan »

bernd wrote:No self test errors here neither on FreeCAD master
Deleting .cfg files fixed it. Sorry for the noise.
"fight the good fight"
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by bernd »

makkemal wrote:Updated
The temp constraint has total heat input in Watt (like yesterday)
Convection constraint also now support heat flux in Watt/m^2
https://github.com/makkemal/FreeCAD/tree/HeatFlux_v2
There are hundreds line ending changes in commit https://github.com/makkemal/FreeCAD/com ... 40e902db7d I deleted them in my dev branch https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion see commit https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... cb0036e238 Could you guys test if I did nothing wrong?

bernd
KgoaOT
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:08 am

Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"

Post by KgoaOT »

@bernd for the Pipe and Circular beam sections, calculix uses the radius and not the diameter as can be seen in the link provided
http://feacluster.com/CalculiX/ccx_2.10 ... ode63.html. But the labels you have used state that the diameter needs to be specified??

Furthermore it seems you have swaped the inputfield for "thickness" and "radius" on the Pipe beam section widget.
Post Reply