FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
Moderator: bernd
Forum rules
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
I'm gone make one for the mesh region object soon, hopefully. I could include this changes. This way it is much easier for the maintainer (Yorik and Werner). How about this?
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
Yes no problem, we are this was for easy-fc we are more concerned with linearised stresses
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
Ahh yes I still would like to have a look at this one too.makkemal wrote:we are more concerned with linearised stresses
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
linearised stress and heat_flux rebases on master and compiles on debian jessie. I integrated in my latest development branch I'm gone use for my next Pull Reques. I may gone post at linerised stress topic after testing. Seebernd wrote:Ahh yes I still would like to have a look at this one too.makkemal wrote:we are more concerned with linearised stresses
https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion
BTW: another 20 commits for FEM.
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
thx a lot!bernd wrote:See
https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion
BTW: another 20 commits for FEM.
Great sw! Great Team!
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
A win test build (direct download link) https://github.com/sgrogan/FreeCAD/rele ... 64build.7z
The pace of FEM development is amazing! Do you guys sleep?
EDIT:
I get some self test errors, they are also in master 0.16.9175. Let me know if you need the details. Don't know why appveyor isn't complaining?
Thanks for the "one stop testing"bernd wrote:linearised stress and heat_flux rebases on master and compiles on debian jessie. I integrated in my latest development branch I'm gone use for my next Pull Request.
The pace of FEM development is amazing! Do you guys sleep?
EDIT:
I get some self test errors, they are also in master 0.16.9175. Let me know if you need the details. Don't know why appveyor isn't complaining?
"fight the good fight"
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
No self test errors here neither on FreeCAD mastersgrogan wrote:I get some self test errors, they are also in master 0.16.9175. Let me know if you need the details. Don't know why appveyor isn't complaining?
OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.17.9175 (Git)
Build type: Unknown
Branch: master
Hash: 26e1a24060df702816e9561b8473bd3fb41825e2
Python version: 2.7.9
Qt version: 4.8.6
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.0.0
nor on my development branch
OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.17.9195 (Git)
Build type: Unknown
Branch: femmeshregion
Hash: dd4fd3a218d1e7cfe7025d7c776386b6905766d3
Python version: 2.7.9
Qt version: 4.8.6
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.0.0
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
Deleting .cfg files fixed it. Sorry for the noise.bernd wrote:No self test errors here neither on FreeCAD master
"fight the good fight"
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
There are hundreds line ending changes in commit https://github.com/makkemal/FreeCAD/com ... 40e902db7d I deleted them in my dev branch https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... meshregion see commit https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeC ... cb0036e238 Could you guys test if I did nothing wrong?makkemal wrote:Updated
The temp constraint has total heat input in Watt (like yesterday)
Convection constraint also now support heat flux in Watt/m^2
https://github.com/makkemal/FreeCAD/tree/HeatFlux_v2
bernd
Re: FEM analysis error on "ThermoMechSteadyState"
@bernd for the Pipe and Circular beam sections, calculix uses the radius and not the diameter as can be seen in the link provided
http://feacluster.com/CalculiX/ccx_2.10 ... ode63.html. But the labels you have used state that the diameter needs to be specified??
Furthermore it seems you have swaped the inputfield for "thickness" and "radius" on the Pipe beam section widget.
http://feacluster.com/CalculiX/ccx_2.10 ... ode63.html. But the labels you have used state that the diameter needs to be specified??
Furthermore it seems you have swaped the inputfield for "thickness" and "radius" on the Pipe beam section widget.