Part Design Roadmap
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Hi, sorry for my absence during last month, the stall is my fault... I hope I'm not too late...
The current state of my branch is the same it was: I just started to port ickby's workarounds bus sucked a bit, and when got some other tasks that consumed almost all my free time... I believe I'll finish it in a couple of days... I will try to came up with some later roadmap after finish this...
The current state of my branch is the same it was: I just started to port ickby's workarounds bus sucked a bit, and when got some other tasks that consumed almost all my free time... I believe I'll finish it in a couple of days... I will try to came up with some later roadmap after finish this...
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Good to see you back and you are not too late.
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Hey Fat-Zer
good to hear you are back! I'm not very far working with your branch, so if you are picking up the work again I would appreciate it
good to hear you are back! I'm not very far working with your branch, so if you are picking up the work again I would appreciate it
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Hey Fat-zer and Ickby,
Which is the "latest branch" we plan to merge with jriegel's master? Is it "AMM-partRework"?
Which is the "latest branch" we plan to merge with jriegel's master? Is it "AMM-partRework"?
Re: Part Design Roadmap
I suppose it is so. But the merge will be not likely possible due to it rebased on the master already...
I'm still currently porting the ickby's workarounds to it now (but a bit stucked with it)... After I finish I suppose we could rebase to the recent master and continue to work from that state... I hope we would be able to finish it to the workable state till the new year and merge to the master...
After that we can cherry-pick all recent changes from the jringle's branch (if any) and continue to work on assembly from that state...
I'm still currently porting the ickby's workarounds to it now (but a bit stucked with it)... After I finish I suppose we could rebase to the recent master and continue to work from that state... I hope we would be able to finish it to the workable state till the new year and merge to the master...
After that we can cherry-pick all recent changes from the jringle's branch (if any) and continue to work on assembly from that state...
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Hi Guys,
I would suggest you concentrate on staying in sync with master, I will merge your changes in my assembly-next branch from time to time.
I really appreciate your work on that. Its really important and make the assembly possible (beside its the right way to do Part Design ;9 )
I would suggest you concentrate on staying in sync with master, I will merge your changes in my assembly-next branch from time to time.
I really appreciate your work on that. Its really important and make the assembly possible (beside its the right way to do Part Design ;9 )
Stop whining - start coding!
Re: Part Design Roadmap
I've finally merged ickby's workarounds (to be sad they needs lots of more love to be completely workable) and rebased on master (git commit 71be79e): https://github.com/Fat-Zer/FreeCAD_sf_master/tree/AMM2
The rebase was easier when the previous one, but as suspected there were lots of conflicts around PartDesign task dialogs with changes bringed by expressions branch, I haven't checked them well yet, but they will likely need to be reviewed (was gonna to do it anyway)... after this will be finished the rebase may be considered complete and I'll try to think on some further roadmap...
The rebase was easier when the previous one, but as suspected there were lots of conflicts around PartDesign task dialogs with changes bringed by expressions branch, I haven't checked them well yet, but they will likely need to be reviewed (was gonna to do it anyway)... after this will be finished the rebase may be considered complete and I'll try to think on some further roadmap...
Re: Part Design Roadmap
nice, I read your comments on github, seemd to be harder than expected. thanks for the effort!I've finally merged ickby's workarounds
Yeah, my implemnentation was not perfect at all, and maybe some extra hassles due to the porting... I will have look if at least the general idea works.to be sad they needs lots of more love to be completely workable
Again good work! I will test the branch over the weekend and try to give some feedback!The rebase was easier when the previous one, but as suspected there were lots of conflicts around PartDesign task dialogs with changes bringed by expressions branch, I haven't checked them well yet, but they will likely need to be reviewed (was gonna to do it anyway)... after this will be finished the rebase may be considered complete and I'll try to think on some further roadmap...
Re: Part Design Roadmap
Are you guys ready for Windows compiler errors? Or not yet?
"fight the good fight"
Re: Part Design Roadmap
I'm good with fixing build errors on any stage, but I'm not very experienced with MS compilers and windows building process, so I may not be able to guess what the msvc complains about...sgrogan wrote:Are you guys ready for Windows compiler errors? Or not yet?