Search found 948 matches

Go to advanced search

by realthunder
Tue Jun 11, 2019 11:29 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

Zolko wrote:
Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:47 pm
There was a time when it was said that your branch could become the next v0.19, do you know anything about this ? The current v0.19 doesn't seem to be your branch. Is there hope ?
I will work on merging the Link part of my branch to upstream soon.
by realthunder
Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:27 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: dog-gone dog-bone.
Replies: 41
Views: 752

Re: dog-gone dog-bone.

sliptonic wrote:
Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:28 pm
Ping. Any ideas?
PR submitted. It's caused by overlapping vertices.
by realthunder
Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:13 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

Simplified down, here it is. Below is file! This is a bug of the Path workbench. I'll submit a PR later. Meanwhile to fix your problem, find out the erroneous object's internal name (just mouse over it and see the name in the status bar), and run the following command. App.ActiveDocument.Profile_Ed...
by realthunder
Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:04 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

However, Im seeing a 'FeaturePython' object has no attribute 'UseRotation' error; will check out for more detail Could you please provide a file show the problem. I've searched code, seems only Robot and Path WB is using attribute with this name. when creating a link transform group, i wanted my z ...
by realthunder
Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:31 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

New version released . For Linux user, please pay attention to the description in the release page. There are now three AppImages. Choose the one that suits you the best. Windows and Mac platform remains the same. I will add Python 3 build for these two platforms in next release. Video demos: Direct...
by realthunder
Sun May 26, 2019 11:59 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: AppImages of v0.18 release builds
Replies: 121
Views: 4992

Re: AppImages of v0.18 release builds

Is it possible for you to try your suggestion (extract appimage and remove mentioned libs)? Yes, I tried, of course, while building asm3 release package. I did my research, you know. I even read the gtk source code. If I didn't find the answer, I would have built a customized gtk package and contin...
by realthunder
Sun May 26, 2019 7:08 am
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: AppImages of v0.18 release builds
Replies: 121
Views: 4992

Re: AppImages of v0.18 release builds

For me there are no theme issues with 0.19 using qt5.6.3. also no pixbuf warnings. Have you tried the latest available 0.19 appimage? I think the problem really depends on your host. I am using ubuntu 16.04. Qt is looking for GTK theme there, and it has broken theme with bundled libgtk because of m...
by realthunder
Sun May 26, 2019 2:37 am
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: AppImages of v0.18 release builds
Replies: 121
Views: 4992

Re: AppImages of v0.18 release builds

looo wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 8:41 pm
ping
The 0.19 conda AppImage theme problem is caused by packing libgtk. I guess libgtk2/3 are on the AppImage/excludedeblist for exactly this reason. Simply delete usr/lib/libgtk* can solve the problem. You may also want to delete usr/lib/libgdk* to get rid of that pixbuf warning as well.
by realthunder
Wed May 22, 2019 10:18 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

That is still too early to tell. We still need a solver with suitable license first. But at least asm3 can run in official FC if my PR is merged. Can you distribute a workbench under a different license? Then you can just have your workbench with the same license as the solver you use. I guess you ...
by realthunder
Tue May 21, 2019 10:32 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly3 preview
Replies: 1285
Views: 106730

Re: Assembly3 preview

... I'll try splitting the Link part and make a PR. What about incorporating(PR) your topo solution; seems to work better than the others ? Got a feeing LINK should be fielded with TOPO (simultaneous)! --??? TOPO continues to be a FC weakness! I very much hope so too. But the Link PR is going to be...

Go to advanced search