Search found 130 matches

Go to advanced search

by schnebeck
Sun Sep 27, 2020 7:06 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option
Replies: 8
Views: 495

Re: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option

sliptonic wrote:ping
Would be nice if someone from the "big guns" takes a look. If this fixes a problem maybe its useful for others too :?:

Bye

Thorsten
by schnebeck
Fri Sep 25, 2020 6:40 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option
Replies: 8
Views: 495

Re: 2DPocket error with activated outline option

This fixed it for me: diff -u master/PathPocketShape.py my/PathPocketShape.py --- master/PathPocketShape.py 2020-09-25 20:10:10.976224628 +0200 +++ my/PathPocketShape.py 2020-09-25 20:09:06.771990280 +0200 @@ -648,7 +648,19 @@ PathLog.debug('PathGeom.combineConnectedShapes shape.BoundBox.ZMin: {}'.f...
by schnebeck
Fri Sep 25, 2020 4:43 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option
Replies: 8
Views: 495

Re: 2DPocket error with activated outline option

Hi, some more infos: I extracted the AppImage and activated debug output in PathPocketShape*.py. This generates some in-process solids that shows an error in generating a valid edge-loop when using the outline option. Without outline option I see this solid Screenshot_20200925_181714.png Its 90° cw ...
by schnebeck
Mon Sep 21, 2020 2:01 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option
Replies: 8
Views: 495

Re: 2DPocket error with activated outline option

It extents the outer edges of the pocket. So you do not need to use fancy dress-up stuff to clean a pocket that reaches an outer geometry of the part. I would like to have this extension config on other Ops, too. If this simply extents a known face or a closed loop of edges building a face, every Op...
by schnebeck
Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:06 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: [fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option
Replies: 8
Views: 495

[fix included] 2DPocket error with activated outline option

Hi, I'm trying to generate a gcode for a little bit complicated part and get errors with the latest appimage. I try to break this down to isolate the problems. In the attaches project you see a simple 2D pocket OP with activated outline option. Without everything is fine. But activated I get: "9Stan...
by schnebeck
Fri Jul 17, 2020 8:38 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Break signal for 3Dsurface
Replies: 28
Views: 1298

Re: Break signal for 3Dsurface

by schnebeck
Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:12 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: start M3 S
Replies: 4
Views: 275

Re: start M3 S

After a long break from 2017, yesterday I started to work g-code created in FC without manual editing. And at once I had to remember the old story - FC creates code, gives the command M3 Sxxxxx, the machine takes everything as written - ie instantly begins to move. In general, after the M3 command ...
by schnebeck
Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:02 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling
Replies: 32
Views: 2794

Re: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling

In case somebody has some time for testing, I did a POC for the "Boundary Dressup": https://github.com/mlampert/FreeCAD/tree/feature/path-constraint-dressup It was @schnebeck who provided the foundation - so all beers should go his way! Cool stuff! I donate my beer if this gets merged into the main...
by schnebeck
Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:10 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling
Replies: 32
Views: 2794

Re: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling

Just saw it with delight :D , but I didn't succeed in creating a partial path. Would you mind uploading your file for investigation? You have to recalculate the adaptive op, otherwise the file would be too big. You have to add the edges from part and stock in two passes. If you select edges from st...
by schnebeck
Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:46 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling
Replies: 32
Views: 2794

Re: Omitting one or more sides when contouring/profiling

chrisb wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:41 pm
Hey, that's a great solution for this recurring issue. Wish we had non cubic stock :mrgreen: .
Hmm, Stock can also be a cylinder or any existing solid, this includes helper plates ;-)

Go to advanced search