Search found 159 matches

Go to advanced search

by hardeeprai
Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:49 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Conference
Replies: 9
Views: 411

Conference

Has FreeCAD developers / users ever conducted any conference?

I might be good, if we have one in near future.

What is your opinion?
by hardeeprai
Thu Jul 11, 2019 4:28 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal
Replies: 163
Views: 8214

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Suraj Dadral wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:34 pm

Code: Select all

from ColumnReinforcement import TwoTiesSixRebars
TwoTiesSixRebars.makeTwoTiesSixRebars(<snip>)
TwoTiesSixRebars.makeTwoTiesSixRebars()

may be named as:

TwoTiesSixRebars.make()

I mean, rather than

foo.foo()

use

foo.make()
by hardeeprai
Thu Jul 11, 2019 4:24 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal
Replies: 163
Views: 8214

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

Suraj Dadral wrote:
Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:21 am
I also discussed this with my civil engineer friends and according to them, diameter of all ties in column is equal in 99% cases.
Take it 100%
by hardeeprai
Thu Jul 11, 2019 4:19 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal
Replies: 163
Views: 8214

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

I have create function makeTwoTiesSixRebars() to create TwoTiesSixRebars column reinforcement. <snip> But there is one problem with LShapeRebars with hook extend along x-axis. It is as shown below: <snip> In above image, the central main rebars direction can be along +ve x-axis or -ve x-axis. I am ...
by hardeeprai
Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:24 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: BCF Support GSoC Proposal
Replies: 106
Views: 4472

Re: BCF Support GSoC Proposal

yorik wrote:
Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:41 pm
Just looked at your code and UI tests, all going in the right direction I think. Keep up the good work!
+1

@ pPodest

Though you are updating your DevLog daily at https://podestplatz.github.io/FreeCAD-b ... /dev-logs/ , but posting here alternate day or twice a week is desirable.
by hardeeprai
Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:47 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: BCF Support GSoC Proposal
Replies: 106
Views: 4472

Re: BCF Support GSoC Proposal

I started a wiki page on github for the plugin. You can view it here . Wit it I intend to give everyone interested an introduction to the plugin, and how it operates under the hood. In addition to that I will update the Readme.md of the plugin repository with a little tutorial on how to use the plu...
by hardeeprai
Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:29 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: BCF Support GSoC Proposal
Replies: 106
Views: 4472

Re: BCF Support GSoC Proposal

One last question regarding the form in which I will write the documentation: Do you mind if I write the documentation in latex? Or what form shall the documentation take on? Should it be already in the form of a wiki page? Though I like LaTeX very much and work a lot with it. But, IMO, you can use...
by hardeeprai
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:55 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal
Replies: 163
Views: 8214

Re: Automate Reinforcement GSoC proposal

@ Suraj On reviewing your current implementation, to make your work more useful to structural engineers / detailer, I suggest: 1. Practically, all tie covers i.e. left, right, top and bottom covers are equal. so, all covers should change according to first i.e. left cover of tie. 2. Add help button ...
by hardeeprai
Sat Jun 15, 2019 2:45 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: BCF Support GSoC Proposal
Replies: 106
Views: 4472

Re: BCF Support GSoC Proposal

I am happy that you like my work, Yorik :) Good code will be liked and appreciated by all Coders :-) That is a good idea, I will certainly do that! The functional modules that are currently available (reader and writer) as well as the classes comprising the data model should not be used directly. I...
by hardeeprai
Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:54 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: BCF Support GSoC Proposal
Replies: 106
Views: 4472

Re: BCF Support GSoC Proposal

bernd wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 9:04 pm
Normally one can edit a comment of an issue, but it will remain in the history of the issue that the comment was changed.
IMO, this is the desired behaviour.

Go to advanced search