Hi! Just to update, http://www.caeplex.com is now fully online accepting new users and user-provided geometries.
Regards
--
jeremy
Search found 39 matches
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:34 pm
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: License for icons in src/Gui/Icons
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2124
Materials
Hi all! For some other project I am working on I took a look at the materials data at src/Mod/Material/StandardMaterial and to the following pages and discussions: http://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Material http://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Material_data_model http://forum....
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 2:41 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Centrifugal Force Simulation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6420
Re: Centrifugal Force Simulation
Hi, just to complete the question, this is my approach (it does not involve FreeCAD, yet):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM-WBgG3YrA&t=2s
You can try it yourself online at http://www.caeplex.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM-WBgG3YrA&t=2s
You can try it yourself online at http://www.caeplex.com
- Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:07 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Re: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
yes, I already found outbernd wrote:jeremy it's in official master already.
It works as expected. It is now my turn to add support for Fino for an alternative to CalculiX...
- Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:17 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Re: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
we need to check if really a strain and not a fixed was applied (the displacement constraint could be both). ... I need to adapt the pre checks in this regard, done. Would be coold if you guys could give it a try. branch: https://github.com/berndhahnebach/FreeCAD_bhb/commits/femallowstrainconstrain...
- Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:13 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Re: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
would you give more explanation? I do not really get the point. After some thought maybe I do? If the analysis is valid, why prohibit it, even if the result is trivial? Let me see if I can. FIrst, it is ok to check that there is at least one Dirichlet BC because otherwise the system matrix will be ...
- Thu Jan 05, 2017 6:04 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Re: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
what would be the problem if only homogenous dirichlet boundary conditions (i.e fixed faces) were given? the displacements would be identically zero throughout the domain, but the problem would be well conditioned nevertheless.
- Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:48 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Re: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
I think this is a FC limitation. You don't have posted an model. but as far as i can read what's written in the python console it looks like you have add a displacement on a face. FreeCAD says something about displacement at an object... so i'm not sure if what you want at this point is possible......
- Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:05 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3980
Why are Neumann BCs mandatory?
Is it a CalculiX restriction?
What if I want to see the stresses when fixing one side of a beam and straining 0.02% the other end in the axis direction?
I get "Static analysis: Neither constraint force nor constraint pressure or a constraint selfweight defined."
What if I want to see the stresses when fixing one side of a beam and straining 0.02% the other end in the axis direction?
I get "Static analysis: Neither constraint force nor constraint pressure or a constraint selfweight defined."
- Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:41 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Multi-material FEM (i.e. compsolids)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1640
Re: Multi-material FEM (i.e. compsolids)
Smooth Bernd!
I was missing the OCC version (I used OCE).
Good work!
--
jeremy
I was missing the OCC version (I used OCE).
Good work!
--
jeremy