Search found 120 matches

Go to advanced search

by kcleung
Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:36 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly 4 workbench
Replies: 786
Views: 106262

Loose / interference fits (was Re: Assembly 4 workbench)

Hi, I just had a look at the Assembly 4 tutorial: https://github.com/Zolko-123/FreeCAD_Examples/blob/master/Asm4_Tutorial1/README.md I feel that Assembly 4 is the most scalable way as it does not require the computation-intensive solver. The tutorial talks about attachment offset etc. So if a user w...
by kcleung
Sat Dec 29, 2018 9:56 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Loose and interference fit modelling in Assembly3
Replies: 4
Views: 574

Loose and interference fit modelling in Assembly3

I've heard some good work in Assembly 3. I just wonder whether loose and interference fit modelling will be supported in Assembly 3? If not, then do we have allowance in the current data structure so that disruptive data structure changes are not required if such support were to be implemented in th...
by kcleung
Sun Aug 27, 2017 8:44 am
Forum: Part Design module development
Topic: ActiveView
Replies: 0
Views: 701

ActiveView

I am currently working on ActiveContainer, but before I continue, I would like to learn first about how ActiveView works, in order to have a full understanding about the rationale of ActiveView, what it does, and how ActiveContainer can complement ActiveView. Could anyone point to a place which expl...
by kcleung
Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:48 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 16513

Re: App.ActiveContainer

DeepSOIC: It is all right, but could you please read my above post about the interaction between activecontainer and activeview?

I need to sort this out to rebase our activecontainer branch onto the current trunk.
by kcleung
Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:12 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 16513

Re: App.ActiveContainer

DeepSOIC: Can you see the reason that our activecontainer still fails to go to the parent of the current container and let us create the new body? Also, I have just tried to rebase my ActiveContainer branch to the current master, but the rebase conflicts when the system applies my commit "PartDesign...
by kcleung
Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:35 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 16513

Re: App.ActiveContainer

add directly to the document if the new object is not accepted by the current active container as a child Makes sense, but it doesn't seem to work for Body? For example, create a new document, click on part design "new body" command. Now the "new body" command is disabled and can't be clicked until...
by kcleung
Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:19 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 16513

Re: App.ActiveContainer

First impressions: 1. Part Design, create Part, create Sketch now creates new body inside the Part. I think that is a good improvement. 2. All geometry objects are added to the active Part. I think this is also good. 3. I don't like that you have to a deactivate a body before being able to create a...
by kcleung
Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:43 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: continuous integration cloud service for Windows
Replies: 3
Views: 620

Re: continuous integration cloud service for Windows

Hmm, are you aware that we already use AppVeyor for a long time? No.... I didn't notice AppVeyor. Thanks for letting me know. I notice that AppVeyor is free for open source project, so I can set one up for my open source project (such as my branch) too. In this way, if any of my commit breaks windo...
by kcleung
Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:34 am
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: continuous integration cloud service for Windows
Replies: 3
Views: 620

continuous integration cloud service for Windows

Hi, We all know that travis-ci cloud service does not currently support windows, and without special permission, time limit is set to 50 minutes, which is insufficient to build a large project such as FreeCAD. However, it is essential to have continuous integration for Windows, to make sure it build...
by kcleung
Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:16 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 16513

Re: App.ActiveContainer

Thanks, I see the issue now. In the line "catch (Exception e)," Exception is resolving to zipios::Exception, and not Base::Exception. After changing it to catch Base::Exception, it builds fine. I am in the process of setting up travis-ci on my github account Note that travis is for linux and macOS....

Go to advanced search