Horrible! I cannot confirm that my diagnosis of the reason for failure is correct.
The solution works anyway!
Roland
Search found 333 matches
- Tue Jan 04, 2022 3:52 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: My FEM fails. How to get further?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2968
- Tue Jan 04, 2022 3:27 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: My FEM fails. How to get further?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2968
Re: My FEM fails. How to get further?
BINGO!
Problem solved.
. How? Perhaps:
. .
I shall appreciate your view of cause and solution.
Greetz
Roland
Problem solved.
. How? Perhaps:
. .
I shall appreciate your view of cause and solution.
Greetz
Roland
- Tue Jan 04, 2022 1:59 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: My FEM fails. How to get further?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2968
Re: My FEM fails. How to get further?
Thanks Alex. 1/ I never used Facebinder. I made those models by Part Fuse (accepting the warning against fusing faces). Upon using Facebinder for the first time I observe that Facebinder does not include some of the shells into the created item. Does this tell me something about the quality of wheth...
- Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:44 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: My FEM fails. How to get further?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2968
Re: My FEM fails. How to get further?
1/ Thanks NewJoker. Can go ahead with your suggestions 2/ Bernd: I posted in the Users forum because I asked for help on usage. I do not see my novice level questions as assisting to FEM Development. But I am glad that my question was noticed. In the near future, all usage questions regarding FEM to...
- Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:27 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: My FEM fails. How to get further?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2968
My FEM fails. How to get further?
Dear FEM experts, I feel a novice in FEM. This is my model: Bearing1_Original.png I want to analyse its strength if an axis (purple) is placed as indicaded and presses downward. I prepared two approaches, of which none succeeded so far. The one based on shells fails with a CalculiX execution error: ...
- Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:07 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Torque + Force
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4436
- Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:25 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Torque + Force
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4436
- Wed Dec 29, 2021 11:06 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Torque + Force
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4436
Re: Torque + Force
That 's a nice result New Joker. Thanks! Which file should Paraview open to evaluate the results in that viewer? I tried a few, but so far I failed. I made a comparison with an analytical approach. I split the problem into 2. 1/ Bending of the beam and 2/ Torquing the beam. I developed analytical so...
- Tue Dec 28, 2021 12:14 am
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Torque + Force
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4436
Re: Torque + Force
The beam is a standard hollow cross section of 120x120x10 mm. Length 1000 m. I shall gladly share the model with you, and greatly appreciate if you could make a check. I am not familiar with the CalculiX tools that you proposed. My analytical skills are limited approaches learned 40 years ago, and f...
- Mon Dec 27, 2021 10:05 pm
- Forum: FEM
- Topic: Torque + Force
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4436
Re: Torque + Force
Thanks NewJoker, I did find an approach that is executed by FEM WB, and perhaps gives a sufficiently reliable result. (that should be evaluated some way or another, and perhaps also looked at from the perspective that you just sketched here above). My process was as follows: I defined the beam as a ...