To me, it feels like migration is not much more than just exploring properties of objects, creating some new objects, modifying properties of existing objects. This is doable with Python out of the box. yes, but It's likely uses some functions not exported in python (I suppose so, I haven't looked ...

Fairly speaking I'm not really exited about that. On one hand the migration itself shouldn't exceed a couple of hundred of lines and mostly it needs just final polish (and some algorithmic decisions)... On the other hand I suppose the PartDesign's python bindings may be not completely implemented an...

With this patch: AMM2_winfix01.patch.zip applied Errors 6 and 8 are unrelated and fixed in FreeCAD/master. just disable build of ReverseEngeniaring workbench (pass -DBUILD_REVERSEENGINEERING=OFF to cmake, not sure how this is done on win) Other errors should be fixed now. I tried to rebase on curre...

ickby , thanks, good work, I've merged everything with small fixes, but a couple QA notices: Please avoid leaving extra spaces on the end of lines (including empty lines), if your text editor allows to do it easy. And follow the git commit message structure: leave an empty line between summarize an...

sgrogan wrote:Are you guys ready for Windows compiler errors? Or not yet?

I'm good with fixing build errors on any stage, but I'm not very experienced with MS compilers and windows building process, so I may not be able to guess what the msvc complains about...

I've finally merged ickby's workarounds (to be sad they needs lots of more love to be completely workable) and rebased on master ( 71be79e ): https://github.com/Fat-Zer/FreeCAD_sf_master/tree/AMM2 The rebase was easier when the previous one, but as suspected there were lots of conflicts around PartD...

Filled in a bug yesterday:
http://freecadweb.org/tracker/view.php?id=2321

I suppose it is so. But the merge will be not likely possible due to it rebased on the master already... I'm still currently porting the ickby's workarounds to it now (but a bit stucked with it)... After I finish I suppose we could rebase to the recent master and continue to work from that state... ...

thanks for finishing that... =) I was going to do it myself in a couple of days

Besides, I do not see the difference between App::PropertyFile and App::PropertyPath!!! This seems to me the same thing... The key difference is that PropertyPath select a directory and the PropertyFile selects a file, they supposed to run different property editors... Can't say anything about the ...