Search found 176 matches

by Fat-Zer
Fri Sep 04, 2015 1:04 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App::Part question
Replies: 59
Views: 19879

Re: App::Part question

The Detail interface replace the usage of SoFCSelection node and gives you more control. Which kind of (Inventor) Detail shows what kind of string is completely on you. FreeCAD selection is only interested in an Subelement string. The rest is local to the viewProvider... Ok, as I can see to handle ...
by Fat-Zer
Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:49 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Forum feature request: [s] tag
Replies: 5
Views: 930

Forum feature request: [s] tag

Could you please add the tag support for crossing out text?
by Fat-Zer
Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:02 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App::Document:Tip what is the intension of the property?
Replies: 8
Views: 3706

Re: App::Document:Tip what is the intension of the property?

If you see a document as a DAG, it can have more then one root objects, which are in no way easy to determine. Tip was introduced for a multi-document environment. A pure PartDesign document will have the Tip pointing to a Part. A Assembly document to the root Assembly/View. A FEM document to the A...
by Fat-Zer
Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:32 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App::Part question
Replies: 59
Views: 19879

Re: App::Part question

Other then the more complex types in FreeCAD, some of the simpler objects in the document can only be selected as a whole. There the string containing the subelement name is set to "Main", which means basically "there is no subelement selected use the whole thing". Yes, sure, bu...
by Fat-Zer
Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:36 pm
Forum: Archived Pull Requests
Topic: More warning fixes
Replies: 10
Views: 1819

Re: More warning fixes

Thanks for looking into this. I've made some changes, and a new branch: https://github.com/eivindkv/free-cad-code/tree/master-warnings-20150902 FreeCAD changes looks good but "Mod/Robot: Removed -Wunused-variable warnings." Salomemesh changes are still controversial in several ways IMHO, ...
by Fat-Zer
Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:13 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App::Part question
Replies: 59
Views: 19879

Re: App::Part question

Hehe, remember: just because it is not your style of programming does not automatically make it worse. I find the lambda stuff to be way clearer as any possible object orientated approach, as the code is located where it normally really is, this makes it way simpler to understand what happens! No n...
by Fat-Zer
Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:53 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App::Part question
Replies: 59
Views: 19879

Re: App::Part question

Finished Part rework. Now the structure of Part classes is next: DocumentObjectGroup — a generic set of objects. GeoFeatureGroup — placeable set of objects. OriginGroup — placeable set of objects with an origin. Part — General abstraction created by the user. Got it's License, Id and other propertie...
by Fat-Zer
Tue Sep 01, 2015 11:28 pm
Forum: Archived Pull Requests
Topic: More warning fixes
Replies: 10
Views: 1819

Re: More warning fixes

left some comments on the github...
by Fat-Zer
Tue Sep 01, 2015 10:26 pm
Forum: Archived Pull Requests
Topic: App::DocumentObserver make methods unimplemented rather pure virtual
Replies: 1
Views: 411

App::DocumentObserver make methods unimplemented rather pure virtual

Previously posted here: http://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12013 The following changes since commit 993a8a858380e2e17eb062a20d807c5cd4d25608: + fix build failure in debug build type (2015-09-01 19:39:34 +0200) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/Fat-Zer/FreeC...
by Fat-Zer
Tue Sep 01, 2015 10:15 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: Warnings when compiling with -Wall on gcc
Replies: 5
Views: 1400

Re: Warnings when compiling with -Wall on gcc

Fat-Zer wrote:Please put -Wall flag before the user specified flags, so it would be possible to disable some warnings
should I make a pull request so this one won't get lost?