Search found 176 matches
- Fri Sep 04, 2015 1:04 am
- Forum: Assembly
- Topic: App::Part question
- Replies: 59
- Views: 19879
Re: App::Part question
The Detail interface replace the usage of SoFCSelection node and gives you more control. Which kind of (Inventor) Detail shows what kind of string is completely on you. FreeCAD selection is only interested in an Subelement string. The rest is local to the viewProvider... Ok, as I can see to handle ...
- Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:49 am
- Forum: Open discussion
- Topic: Forum feature request: [s] tag
- Replies: 5
- Views: 930
Forum feature request: [s] tag
Could you please add the tag support for crossing out text?
- Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:02 am
- Forum: Assembly
- Topic: App::Document:Tip what is the intension of the property?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3706
Re: App::Document:Tip what is the intension of the property?
If you see a document as a DAG, it can have more then one root objects, which are in no way easy to determine. Tip was introduced for a multi-document environment. A pure PartDesign document will have the Tip pointing to a Part. A Assembly document to the root Assembly/View. A FEM document to the A...
- Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:32 am
- Forum: Assembly
- Topic: App::Part question
- Replies: 59
- Views: 19879
Re: App::Part question
Other then the more complex types in FreeCAD, some of the simpler objects in the document can only be selected as a whole. There the string containing the subelement name is set to "Main", which means basically "there is no subelement selected use the whole thing". Yes, sure, bu...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:36 pm
- Forum: Archived Pull Requests
- Topic: More warning fixes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1819
Re: More warning fixes
Thanks for looking into this. I've made some changes, and a new branch: https://github.com/eivindkv/free-cad-code/tree/master-warnings-20150902 FreeCAD changes looks good but "Mod/Robot: Removed -Wunused-variable warnings." Salomemesh changes are still controversial in several ways IMHO, ...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:13 pm
- Forum: Assembly
- Topic: App::Part question
- Replies: 59
- Views: 19879
Re: App::Part question
Hehe, remember: just because it is not your style of programming does not automatically make it worse. I find the lambda stuff to be way clearer as any possible object orientated approach, as the code is located where it normally really is, this makes it way simpler to understand what happens! No n...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:53 am
- Forum: Assembly
- Topic: App::Part question
- Replies: 59
- Views: 19879
Re: App::Part question
Finished Part rework. Now the structure of Part classes is next: DocumentObjectGroup — a generic set of objects. GeoFeatureGroup — placeable set of objects. OriginGroup — placeable set of objects with an origin. Part — General abstraction created by the user. Got it's License, Id and other propertie...
- Tue Sep 01, 2015 11:28 pm
- Forum: Archived Pull Requests
- Topic: More warning fixes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1819
Re: More warning fixes
left some comments on the github...
- Tue Sep 01, 2015 10:26 pm
- Forum: Archived Pull Requests
- Topic: App::DocumentObserver make methods unimplemented rather pure virtual
- Replies: 1
- Views: 411
App::DocumentObserver make methods unimplemented rather pure virtual
Previously posted here: http://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12013 The following changes since commit 993a8a858380e2e17eb062a20d807c5cd4d25608: + fix build failure in debug build type (2015-09-01 19:39:34 +0200) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/Fat-Zer/FreeC...
- Tue Sep 01, 2015 10:15 pm
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: Warnings when compiling with -Wall on gcc
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1400
Re: Warnings when compiling with -Wall on gcc
should I make a pull request so this one won't get lost?Fat-Zer wrote:Please put -Wall flag before the user specified flags, so it would be possible to disable some warnings