Search found 162 matches

Go to advanced search

by jnxd
Tue Apr 11, 2017 8:17 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

@ickby, in your Reference class you have this method:
ickby wrote: asIndendetString
Was this a spelling mistake? If yes, was it meant to be asIndentedString or as asIndependentString?
by jnxd
Wed Apr 05, 2017 4:42 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

Actually, I have an idea. How about having a start by adding an interesting feature to Part/PartDesign, that is just a little bit related to toponaming? I think it will be more-or-less within the proposal, yet fun! I am pressing that "want to mentor" button :mrgreen: Glad to see you on board! Howev...
by jnxd
Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:16 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

DeepSOIC wrote:s.
1. Have you ever created a feature based on OCC shape from scratch? (either in C++ or in Python).
By python do you mean pythonocc? I haven't used it, but was just wondering if there is any other way of using occ with python.
by jnxd
Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:15 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

Hi! I'm in doubt if I want to mentor you or not. Your choice of task is unexpectedly ambitious, and we (me and ickby) think that the odds of failure are just too high. So I'd like to ask a few questions. 1. Have you ever created a feature based on OCC shape from scratch? (either in C++ or in Python...
by jnxd
Thu Mar 30, 2017 5:47 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

I think it would be good to discuss a few technical things first, so that you get at least a first impression on the topic and what it is about. Are you on IRC/Gitter in 2hours? We could talk a bit about the technical side of things. It would be terribly late at night but I could make around 20 min...
by jnxd
Thu Mar 30, 2017 5:16 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd
Replies: 76
Views: 7333

Re: Proposal for GSoC - jnxd

Hello jnxd, as there is now one week till the end of proposal phase I would recommend to upload your proposal to the GSoC site in status draft for us to review. You can still edit it there as long as you dont set it to final, but this gets the officiel workflow startet and you will see if there are...
by jnxd
Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:02 pm
Forum: Part Design module development
Topic: Question about Part Feature
Replies: 27
Views: 3953

Re: Question about Part Feature

Is current PartDesign NEXT Part feature equivalent of a Part or of an Assembly or both? Assembly will most likely consist of Instances of Parts, or Parts themselves. Part will probably be able to contain a (sub)assembly, but I'm not sure... Part is called "Part", but you can use it for anything you...
by jnxd
Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:20 am
Forum: Part Design module development
Topic: Polar pattern bugs
Replies: 21
Views: 3425

Re: Polar pattern bugs

Slightly off-topic, but can anyone explain me why there has to be a major difference between when the angle is 359 deg and when it is 360 deg?
by jnxd
Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:52 pm
Forum: UX/UI Design
Topic: I think the icons of freecad need to be redesigned
Replies: 74
Views: 8441

Re: I think the icons of freecad need to be redesigned

Joining the bandwagon. Not really happy with the size of the gear or the size of the f. Hoping someone could help refine it.
freecad_spline_F_00.svg.png
freecad_spline_F_00.svg.png (4.11 KiB) Viewed 947 times
by jnxd
Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:16 pm
Forum: UX/UI Design
Topic: I think the icons of freecad need to be redesigned
Replies: 74
Views: 8441

Re: I think the icons of freecad need to be redesigned

P.S. As for other geometry changes proposals in the second variation. At the bottom of F you introduced small radius. Maybe a change like that could work on the current F. I guess a small tribute to spline advancements achieved in the FreeCAD 0.17 development cycle. That is if anybody would ask on ...

Go to advanced search