Search found 461 matches

by wsteffe
Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:10 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule

This and many other threads, here and in other social media, basically say is it's inconvenient and doesn't work like other CAD systems. Again for years. In fact a lot of people is complaining about the assurdity of the one body/one solid rule. Is it a good reason? I don't know. By yourself admissi...
by wsteffe
Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:56 pm
Forum: Pull Requests
Topic: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket
Replies: 63
Views: 51436

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

just because you personally don't need something does not mean it's not worth having I didn't say I don't want it. Just asked to better understand the need. Anyway I think that to implement it you have to copy the given sketch into a new temporary sketch. Then you have to add an outer rectangle def...
by wsteffe
Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:49 am
Forum: Pull Requests
Topic: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket
Replies: 63
Views: 51436

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

I do not understand the need to add the option "Remove outside" to a pocket considering that you may already get the same result adding (to the sketch) a closed profile (in example a rectangle) which encloses the sketch and the projection (on the sketch plane) of the base feature.
by wsteffe
Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:26 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

chrisb wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 10:36 pm I have split the post as it went totally off topic.
Good idea. But then let also change the thread title into something like "Allowing more solids in a Body container".
by wsteffe
Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:20 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

FBXL5 wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:00 pm t is forbidden by the single solid rule now...
Yes. And it is a pointless rule.
by wsteffe
Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:32 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

here are multiple situations where it would not be obvious on plain sight that the body has multiple solids Ok could be not so evident when you open a document with several bodies which was prepared by another person. If it was made by yourself you should have noticed the solilds when working in th...
by wsteffe
Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:48 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

FBXL5 wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 4:04 pm I would prefer a tag rather than forbidding multi solids.
Do you really need a tag to see that there is more than one solid ? If so I think you have a serious problem.
by wsteffe
Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:45 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

No argument has been presented that supports not allowing this, so by default the conclusion is that it should be permitted, so the only complaint left to be discussed is what words to use to communicate such things. +1 to be precise: no argument accepted by you. But as participation here is rather...
by wsteffe
Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:37 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

@realthunder just to clarify: Moving Split_i0 (or Split_i1) to a different body would not be really important to me. If I have extruded them from a single sketch in the same Body, it is because I wanted to have both there. But the fact that apparence/color cant't be applied to split_i0, split_i1 see...
by wsteffe
Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:17 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26167

Re: #4828 PartDesign: inverse for pocket

to get the same results in catia one would actually first add manually two bodies and then create the sketch and two profile outputs from the sketch that would then be used to create individual extrudes (pad's in catia) for two solids in the two bodies (if one would follow a bit cleaner workflow on...