Search found 1771 matches

by mlampert
Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:10 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Tool shapes and parameters
Replies: 16
Views: 9617

Re: Tool shapes and parameters

I will rest a bit and continue with other tool types, if you don't mind. But please, if you think I am wrong, say it. This discussion is very important, and everyone hided for some reason. This is great info - the spec drawing for the rill is very enlightening. Anyhow - take your time and rest well...
by mlampert
Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:02 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Tool table segfaults FreeCAD
Replies: 58
Views: 12200

Re: Tool table segfaults FreeCAD

Also on latest Fedora 25 it crashes, and is hard to down-grade, any idea how to fix? when I downgrade the Debian version they have no dependencies. So all you have to do is find the packages "libexpat1" and "libexpat1-dev" (in case you're compiling" and install those. Unfor...
by mlampert
Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:58 pm
Forum: TechDraw
Topic: Bug in view of rotated shape
Replies: 9
Views: 2464

Re: Bug in view of rotated shape

One thing is strange though, when I load the file into the OCC7 build I get 2 exceptions and 2 Dimensions are not associated with the View anymore. The radius and the angle dimension are the 2 that get "lost". Log: Error: DVD - Dimension - 2D references are corrupt Log: INFO - DVD::getDim...
by mlampert
Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:03 pm
Forum: TechDraw
Topic: Bug in view of rotated shape
Replies: 9
Views: 2464

Re: Bug in view of rotated shape

One thing is strange though, when I load the file into the OCC7 build I get 2 exceptions and 2 Dimensions are not associated with the View anymore. The radius and the angle dimension are the 2 that get "lost". Not a big deal for me but I thought I'll mention it for completeness.
by mlampert
Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:21 am
Forum: TechDraw
Topic: Bug in view of rotated shape
Replies: 9
Views: 2464

Re: Bug in view of rotated shape

Hi @mlampert. The issue was resolved in OCC 7+. Indeed - took me a while to build under OCC and it is truly fixed Sorry for the noise. OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing (buster) Word size of OS: 64-bit Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit Version: 0.17.11793 (Git) Build type: Debug Branch: master Hash: 26f8cb6f...
by mlampert
Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:03 pm
Forum: TechDraw
Topic: Bug in view of rotated shape
Replies: 9
Views: 2464

Bug in view of rotated shape

I created a simple part by rotating a sketch. It seems TechDraw has issues with the arc. Depending on the direction of the view it doesn't exist at all, or only exists on one side.
by mlampert
Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:59 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Tool shapes and parameters
Replies: 16
Views: 9617

Tool shapes and parameters

Given the discussion we had at the drilling page I got curious and tried to figure out what's what. Attached is a file with what I came up with (there seems to be a bug in tech draw). tool.png Given these parameters it seems one can model cylindrical cutters (straight and conic), ball cutters (strai...
by mlampert
Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:01 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Path Operations refactor branch.
Replies: 44
Views: 9410

Path Operations refactor branch.

As hinted in some of the threads we've refactored almost all operations and consolidated most of the common code. All ops are now split into the op itself (which can be used in a script without UI), and the UI and command for it. The UI for all commands is structured the same and uses the same UI el...
by mlampert
Mon Aug 14, 2017 6:00 pm
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Drillbit tip compensation
Replies: 22
Views: 4549

Re: Drillbit tip compensation

Ok, will someone remove my patch back, or should I fill another pull request (and break something else)? Sorry, should have mentioned that I have submitted PR-927 (already merged) which reverted your change and limits the angle to >=0 and <90. Having said that, as sliptonic mentioned we should prob...
by mlampert
Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:15 am
Forum: Path/CAM
Topic: Drillbit tip compensation
Replies: 22
Views: 4549

Re: Drillbit tip compensation

Ah, the problem is actually your tool definition. The cutting edge angle is to be expected as the angle specified in the datasheet, and `PathUtils.drillTipLength()` automatically doubles that angle. But because you have manually doubled it to 118° the resulting tooltip calculation returns a negativ...