The deploy script makes sure there is only one build so that the daily builds don't accumulate. Since travis is set to deploy to the 0.18_pre release, triggering a build on the release branch makes it overwrite the current 0.18 build. What I'll have to do is first download the 0.17 build, upload it ...

Found a solution: https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull ... cc214d9165

I've put together a minimal example demonstrating the problem and posted it on the OCCT forums. https://www.opencascade.com/content/exp ... oing-wrong

looo wrote: ↑Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:34 pm does anybody know why we need the libmed library???

You should talk to the FEM guys to see if SALOME Med file format support is useful, but do we want to deviate from the official smesh that much? Or maybe we already have - I don't know.

Currently it uses the name, but it should be changed to use the tag so that it doesn't matter what the name is.

Which release they are deployed to is specified by a travis variable "DEPLOY_RELEASE," which I set to 0.18_pre right after the 0.17 release. I think the script can't handle spaces in the release name, because setting DEPLOY_RELEASE to "FreeCAD 0.17 Roland" didn't seem to work the...

Can you be more specific? Do you have examples that you can link to? Also, do you have examples of what problems are solved by Manipulator Workbench, Part-o-Magic or Lattice?

Is there any actual reason behind this opinion? Well, let's say I want to create a part that requires two bodies. I first create the part "part 1" and then create a new body and it is added to "part 1" because it is the active part. After finishing the first body, I add a second...

DeepSOIC's active container is nice in someways, but abstracting away active part and active body to one active container is going too far, IMO. All that I really want is all geometry objects to go into the active part including new parts. I also find it strange that you can have an active body in a...

easyw-fc wrote: ↑Tue Apr 10, 2018 5:04 pm The main issue was anyway related to 'QtGui.QApplication' (QtGui.qApp is no more available).

Since we upgraded Qt we also had to use the latest PySide2, so that is something they must have changed.