@project4, this evening i will try to change the implementation of axis-direction. ;) This will gain some speed during iteration as there are no decisions to do concerning direction. Still wondering where the problems with rotation are coming from... Ohhh... More changes to follow up and integrate ...

@project4, is it still possible to deactivate stage handling within your thread ? I would like to merge as fast as possible branch solver-stabi and yours. Perhaps you can activation/deactivation with a central flag somewhere. What do you mean by "stage handling"? So that your new variant ...

@project4, is it still possible to deactivate stage handling within your thread ? I would like to merge as fast as possible branch solver-stabi and yours. Perhaps you can activation/deactivation with a central flag somewhere. I integrated the changes from your "improved iteration speed", ...

kbwbe wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:57 am @project4,

is it still possible to deactivate stage handling within your thread ? I would like to merge as fast as possible branch solver-stabi and yours.
Perhaps you can activation/deactivation with a central flag somewhere.

What do you mean by "stage handling"?

@project4, this evening i will try to change the implementation of axis-direction. ;) This will gain some speed during iteration as there are no decisions to do concerning direction. Still wondering where the problems with rotation are coming from... Ohhh... More changes to follow up and integrate ...

Hi @project4, i am just finishing some small modifications of solversystem in my branch. I will merge within 1/2 hour about. Iterating speed went up factor 2. I made same experience as you. Algorithm seems to be better suitable for small and big parts, but convergency is lower and needs more steps....

I started to play with the module and 2 options are missing from the previous Assembly2: - in the python interface, the number of remaining DOF (very usefull to "help" the solver if it always equals to zero), DOF is not yet implemented, but we're studying that direction and will definitel...

@kbwbe I think I've finished the code refubrishing. Pushing it here: https://github.com/abetis/A2plus/tree/load_deps_when_needed I've integrated all the changes from your solver-stabilization branch. But not all the files could be resolved... I've switched back to your branch, but it couldn't resolv...

WARNING: Long and mindbreaking post :) I had a similar way of thinking recently, but that way also improves the 6DOF model processing... platform1(fixed) + cylynders are added to the computation. To determine the allowed movement+rotation we have to move the hierarchy using father pointer up to a r...

Hi @Turro, this are good news. If we need six axis' inside a rigid, I think we have to implement 2 vectors per axis. One to the beginning, one to the end. So if a rigid is rotated, the axis can be reconstructed. But it will be more overhead as there 12 vectors more to be rotated. It is a lot ! Can'...