Search found 225 matches

by C_h_o_p_i_n
Wed Nov 01, 2023 7:40 am
Forum: Draft, Arch & BIM
Topic: 3d -> 2d for lasercut ?
Replies: 4
Views: 3868

3d -> 2d for lasercut ?

Hello all, on suggestion I would like to ask my question here as well. I have created a 3D "object" in Partdesign that consists of four bodies. So far so good. Now I want to laser cut the individual "elements" - the bodies - from a sheet of plywood. After some searching, I came a...
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Tue Oct 31, 2023 9:18 pm
Forum: Forum in Deutsch
Topic: Projekt "Lokkessel vom Schrott" in 1:87 -> Fragen/Probleme
Replies: 41
Views: 17819

Re: Projekt "Lokkessel vom Schrott" in 1:87 -> Fragen/Probleme

Hallo Zusamme, Auf die Dinger die wie Muttern aussehen bezogen: bei den Stehbolzen die die Decke der Feuerbüchse mit der Kesselaußenwand verbunden haben, gab es welche, die hohl waren. Wenn die gebrochen oder sonst wie kaputt waren trat Wasser aus als ... Defektanzeige. Wenn das nur einer war konnte...
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:36 am
Forum: Forum in Deutsch
Topic: Frage zu Vorlagen für Laserplotter erstellen / Arch Panel
Replies: 6
Views: 4107

Frage zu Vorlagen für Laserplotter erstellen / Arch Panel

Hallo Zusammen, ich hab mir in Partdesign ein aus vier Bodies bestehendes 3D-"Objekt" erstellt. So weit so gut. Nun würde ich die einzelnen "Elemente" - sprich Bodies gern per Laser aus ner Sperrholzplatte schneiden. Nach ein bisschen Suchen bin ich über die Arch WB mit den Funkt...
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Sun Oct 22, 2023 8:42 am
Forum: Toponaming forum
Topic: Status of the Linkstage3 branch?
Replies: 17
Views: 47078

Re: Status of the Linkstage3 branch?

Hi,
jw_NRE wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:06 am Something screwy going on with the Addon Manager with this. Lots of crashes.
--> Did you report the crash ?

Notifcation --> @realthunder
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:55 pm
Forum: Toponaming forum
Topic: Status of the Linkstage3 branch?
Replies: 17
Views: 47078

Re: Status of the Linkstage3 branch?

Hi All,

at least - there is a new "TIP" Version available (whatever Tip means - guessing "test in Progress") , dated 18.Oct. 23 :

https://github.com/realthunder/FreeCAD/releases

Branch seems now to be named/based "Linkmerge"

Regards,
Stefan
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:47 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: [Poll] Where to put Sketcher tools settings ?
Replies: 8
Views: 1264

Re: [Poll] Where to put Sketcher tools settings ?

Hi All,

... maybe the area where nearly all other "context dependend settings menues" are usually shown ?!
A free floating widget might cover in an unexpected way areas where you're just were going to do something.

just my 2cts,

Stefan
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:36 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Proposal to consider within a new assembly WB
Replies: 1
Views: 422

Proposal to consider within a new assembly WB

Hi all, whenever I come across the Fastner WB I'm thinking - how about migrate this WB into a upcomming new assembly WB. While I know, that there are way more ways, how parts might be assembeld - i think - why not directely use "Screws" to mount parts where it's already planned to do so. O...
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:09 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Tip release
Replies: 2
Views: 1061

Re: Tip release

Hi All,

IMHO - and - I'm only guessing ...

I can imagine that Tip stands for T(est(ing)) I(n) P(rogress ) - it's also marked as a "pre-release" .

Just my 2 ct's,
Stefan
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:52 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26055

Re: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule

No one will force you to change your way, if you're eager to follow your own single solid per body paradigm. Good point. If we have a switch to set either then I would be all in. I always thought there was a structure to modeling where you can't have free hanging objects. I thought every object (ha...
by C_h_o_p_i_n
Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:06 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule
Replies: 191
Views: 26055

Re: A randomly started discussion about the necessity of the PD single solid rule

The single solid rule is good, it's analogous to a sharp stick poking the user to expand their modeling skill. Currently the tree has a numbering scheme that numbers/renumbers the single solids as they are created. How would that work? Humans always take the easy route so they will try and model a ...