Search found 19 matches
- Sun Nov 20, 2016 12:54 am
- Forum: TechDraw
- Topic: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
- Replies: 322
- Views: 111332
Re: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
Somehow I think there are some bigger problems with the projections themselves. I think there is something like a projection angle missing. When you add a projection group the Spin CW/CCW buttons changes the position & names of the secondary projections correctly, but doesn't rotate them and the...
- Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:17 am
- Forum: TechDraw
- Topic: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
- Replies: 322
- Views: 111332
Re: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
Uhm... don't bother with that today. I reread your and my code; yours wasn't so bad, mine has its own problems I think. I'll rethink both variants.wandererfan wrote:Not supposed to look like that. The cut looks right but the view direction is wrong. I'll give your code a try.
- Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:20 pm
- Forum: TechDraw
- Topic: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
- Replies: 322
- Views: 111332
Re: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
Do you have an example of what's wrong with the projection settings? Here is a messy picture of an example cube: http://i.imgur.com/0eFzAxA.png Section A-A has a wrong projection with the old code, or is it supposed to be like that? Looking at the picture, I think the sign of my code is wrong (like...
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:18 pm
- Forum: TechDraw
- Topic: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
- Replies: 322
- Views: 111332
Re: The Big TechDraw Comments Thread
I may have a small fix to the section default projection settings. In recent Git, I think the defaults are wrong (but then I am not a pro on those drawings, maybe thats for reason normal behaviour). Anyways, here is a diff: http://pastebin.com/PHiKL6EF Or the modified calcValues function: http://pas...
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:36 am
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: Distributing FreeCAD For Linux
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6450
- Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:31 pm
- Forum: Part Design module development
- Topic: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
- Replies: 25
- Views: 9916
Re: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
In the bug report I also added a crash report based on the same steps. I wonder if I should file a separate bug report.
I appended a small python script to provoke that crash...
I appended a small python script to provoke that crash...
- Tue May 31, 2016 2:28 pm
- Forum: Part Design module development
- Topic: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
- Replies: 25
- Views: 9916
Re: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
But you did manage to reproduce the problem?
*edit*
I did a frech checkout and compile of the source on my other computer with Fedora 23 and the bug was reproducible, so I reported it.
*edit*
I did a frech checkout and compile of the source on my other computer with Fedora 23 and the bug was reproducible, so I reported it.
- Tue May 31, 2016 11:09 am
- Forum: Part Design module development
- Topic: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
- Replies: 25
- Views: 9916
Re: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
To be specific, I'm talking about Part Design Next boolean. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear. It apart from this error, it works for me.
I edited the first post to clarify.
I edited the first post to clarify.
- Tue May 31, 2016 10:09 am
- Forum: Part Design module development
- Topic: [Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
- Replies: 25
- Views: 9916
[Bug] placement of boolean base propagates to secondary body
In Part Design Next, when I make a boolean operation between two bodies and then change the placement (angle or position) of the first (base) body, the new placement propagates to the secondary body. However, when I now modify the second body, the original placement of the body is restored and the b...