Terve Anders, great to hear from you! 1. Licensing. Would a change to LGPL make building/linking/packaging with FreeCAD easier? - please post an issue on github explaining the situation and what would be the desired license. I let others comment about licensing. I have no clue, except for reading th...

I've been toying around with OpenVoronoi ( https://github.com/aewallin/openvoronoi ) for a while every now and then. Just for fun mostly, but I think the results are nice, so thought I can show some here. The library contains (experimental) medial axis pocketing algorithm which I used. I find that t...

Absolutely! For clarity, I removed other ops, only chamfers are there.

This is good addition! Are inside edges supposed to be supported? At least on my first trial, this came out: 2018-07-09-081605_1920x1080_scrot.png On the other hand, when selecting a face with both inside and outside features, both came out right. But, like you say, adding the chamfer to a face adds...

I think the idea is great! When used as a separate dialog it looks good but as a task dialog, with default panel width, the usability is not too great. input boxes for D and H are too narrow.. Also, the panel has a vertical scroll bar even though there would be tons of space below the panel..? 2018-...

The PR is submitted. https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/1542 Repeating myself from yesterday, but here are the changes: -The drop cutter operation respects FinalDepth parameter, i.e. never cuts below that. When the operation is created, the OpFinalDepth is guessed and I find that the guess is w...

One remaining issue that would greatly benefit surface profiling would be the ability to used non-cylindrical cutters, specifically ball-end cutters. I suspect this adds quite a bit of complexity to the drop cut process, but I believe that the original Anders Wallin OpenCamLib supports some non-cyl...

Reviving and old'ish thread.. Yesterday I tried using the 3D Surface OP for the first time. After reading quite a few forum threads highlighting the problems with it, I was actually surprised that it worked almost out of the box. But I ran into exactly the problem described in the start of this thre...

Hi, When trying to generate some screeshots for documenting the Ramp Entry Dressup like discussed on this thread , I ran into issues with a very simple Path. Essentially just a contour around 50x50x10mm box with step down of 3mm. The problem is, that with helix ramp method, the last round of the loo...

Thank you Chris! It looks very good. Hope you get your mill back in action soon! The only thing that I can think of: Dressup Start Depth is the distance above the target level where ramping starts is a bit misleading in my (non-English) mind. It kind of says to me that this parameter is a delta betw...