I did a new installation of the whole package. When running the Wyk-example, I get this error: 08:52:06 construct sparse global stiffness matrix: 6.71e-01 s 08:52:06 08:52:11 Traceback (most recent call last): 08:52:11 File "<string>", line 202, in start_clicked 08:52:11 File "<string...

... I can't reproduce your results. At load factor = 1.27 Maximum integration point: CSR = 8.28 Maximum (unaveraged) nodal value: CSR = 15.56 (highly localised) Averaged CSR value over stiffener plate thickness = 4.04 (reduced, but still high, as expected) ... We selected different edges. You selec...

HarryvL wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 11:34 am ...
Nice. Try the critical edge too.

You can select several faces and edges holding the control key.

works

Updated fcvm-wb, for me it works. Nice.

quick and dirty:
Solver buoyantPimpleFoam, 2D, runtime 600 sec.

R139,7x8 tube S235 with clamp under 7,5 kNm momentum loading.
@HarryvL : +1

... I can't reproduce this. For me: 1) first run fcVM and inspect VTK pipeline - OK 2) run CCX after fcVM and inspect VTK pipeline - OK 3) run fcVM again and inspect VTK pipeline - OK can you show your step-by-step workflow from a fresh start? PS: the swivel widget is blocking the top of the color ...

... 1. If you start FC0.21.2 and don’t activate fcVM, but use CCX do you then see the numerical values? 2. Let me have a look. I may have to clear some results when deactivating fcVM. How do you quit fcVM before running a “normal” (CCX?) analysis? To 1: Yes, values are visible To 2: After running f...

johnwang wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:09 pm What happens if you do "normal" FEM in miniforge with fc0.21.2?

FEM-wb works as usual, I can see no difference.
cfdof-wb does not work.