Search found 162 matches

by kcleung
Sat Apr 17, 2021 11:47 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Library for meccano and eitech standard parts and assemblies, and a workbench similar to LeoCAD for assembly of kits
Replies: 2
Views: 858

Library for meccano and eitech standard parts and assemblies, and a workbench similar to LeoCAD for assembly of kits

There are construction kits such as Meccano for imperial measurements and Eitech for metric measurements, as well as LEGO, all of which have a library of standard parts. Given that Parts, PartDesign and Assembly 4 are becoming mature, wouldn't it be great to develop a FreeCAD library based on Parts,...
by kcleung
Sat Apr 17, 2021 11:33 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: loose, transition and interference fit in Assembly 4
Replies: 5
Views: 1836

loose, transition and interference fit in Assembly 4

I am glad to see that FreeCAD 0.19 has finally be released, and that Assembly 4 is becoming usable. So in assembly 4, how can one implement loose fit, transition fit and interference fit? It would be great if the workbench and the assembly data structure has a way to specify loose fit and interferen...
by kcleung
Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:36 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Assembly 4 workbench
Replies: 1343
Views: 896304

Loose / interference fits (was Re: Assembly 4 workbench)

Hi, I just had a look at the Assembly 4 tutorial: https://github.com/Zolko-123/FreeCAD_Examples/blob/master/Asm4_Tutorial1/README.md I feel that Assembly 4 is the most scalable way as it does not require the computation-intensive solver. The tutorial talks about attachment offset etc. So if a user w...
by kcleung
Sat Dec 29, 2018 9:56 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: Loose and interference fit modelling in Assembly3
Replies: 4
Views: 1193

Loose and interference fit modelling in Assembly3

I've heard some good work in Assembly 3. I just wonder whether loose and interference fit modelling will be supported in Assembly 3? If not, then do we have allowance in the current data structure so that disruptive data structure changes are not required if such support were to be implemented in th...
by kcleung
Sun Aug 27, 2017 8:44 am
Forum: Part Design module development
Topic: ActiveView
Replies: 0
Views: 1042

ActiveView

I am currently working on ActiveContainer, but before I continue, I would like to learn first about how ActiveView works, in order to have a full understanding about the rationale of ActiveView, what it does, and how ActiveContainer can complement ActiveView. Could anyone point to a place which expl...
by kcleung
Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:48 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 32386

Re: App.ActiveContainer

DeepSOIC: It is all right, but could you please read my above post about the interaction between activecontainer and activeview?

I need to sort this out to rebase our activecontainer branch onto the current trunk.
by kcleung
Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:12 pm
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 32386

Re: App.ActiveContainer

DeepSOIC: Can you see the reason that our activecontainer still fails to go to the parent of the current container and let us create the new body? Also, I have just tried to rebase my ActiveContainer branch to the current master, but the rebase conflicts when the system applies my commit "PartD...
by kcleung
Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:35 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 32386

Re: App.ActiveContainer

add directly to the document if the new object is not accepted by the current active container as a child Makes sense, but it doesn't seem to work for Body? For example, create a new document, click on part design "new body" command. Now the "new body" command is disabled and ca...
by kcleung
Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:19 am
Forum: Assembly
Topic: App.ActiveContainer
Replies: 150
Views: 32386

Re: App.ActiveContainer

First impressions: 1. Part Design, create Part, create Sketch now creates new body inside the Part. I think that is a good improvement. 2. All geometry objects are added to the active Part. I think this is also good. 3. I don't like that you have to a deactivate a body before being able to create a...
by kcleung
Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:43 pm
Forum: Developers corner
Topic: continuous integration cloud service for Windows
Replies: 3
Views: 1460

Re: continuous integration cloud service for Windows

Hmm, are you aware that we already use AppVeyor for a long time? No.... I didn't notice AppVeyor. Thanks for letting me know. I notice that AppVeyor is free for open source project, so I can set one up for my open source project (such as my branch) too. In this way, if any of my commit breaks windo...