Search found 6193 matches
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 8:07 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] conda: vtk9 / occt7.5 / python3.9 / boost1.74 migration
- Replies: 7
- Views: 386
Re: [WIP] conda: vtk9 / occt7.5 / python3.9 / boost1.74 migration
I get the same FEM test errors with the PY3.8 version, so it must be SMESH/vtk9 releated? OS: Windows 10 (10.0) Word size of OS: 64-bit Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit Version: 0.19.23739 (Git) Build type: Release Branch: master Hash: 020e5bc7093a8a07b89edd92e6c12496457b7ad6 Python version: 3.8.6 Qt ve...
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:45 pm
- Forum: Install / Compile
- Topic: No new precompiled versions?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 912
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:40 pm
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: Advise on requirements for version control of Qt UI XML files
- Replies: 62
- Views: 1678
Re: Advise on requirements for version control of Qt UI XML files
The lxml module can be fetched from here: https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#lxml whl is a compressed format (probably zip) that can be opened with 7-zip. Drag and drop the content to the directory of sort_ui.bat Since python3 pip works well with the Libpacks From the the Liback/bin direct...
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 4:57 pm
- Forum: Packaging
- Topic: [WIP] conda: vtk9 / occt7.5 / python3.9 / boost1.74 migration
- Replies: 7
- Views: 386
Re: [WIP] conda: vtk9 / occt7.5 / python3.9 / boost1.74 migration
Would be nice if some people can test and help with fixing the remaining issues. FEM tests have a hard dependency on matplotlib. After installing this I get 3 self test errors related to MeshGroups. I will investigate. I also get 1 error related to the StartGui, I also get this on all other builds ...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:26 pm
- Forum: Install / Compile
- Topic: No new precompiled versions?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 912
Re: No new precompiled versions?
I don't know if github releases page will allow a .torrent.
If you have a file I don't mind testing.
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:09 pm
- Forum: Install / Compile
- Topic: No new precompiled versions?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 912
Re: No new precompiled versions?
I can do this. But if you succeed with setting things up locally it would be nice if you can upload directly. It really shouldn't be very difficult. OK, hopefully I'll have time to try and build the AppImage locally this weekend. I still have the mac-mini from @chrisb. I can reactivate it to do thi...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:03 pm
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: Updating Windows Libpack on Travis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 169
Re: Updating Windows Libpack on Travis
Is there a process for deciding when to update the Libpack used on Travis? Right now it's on 12.1.6 (latest is 12.4.2). There's a unit test failing on PR 4296 that I can't replicate on a local installation (using the latest libpack), and I'm wondering if it's an OCCT problem. There is no process. I...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:55 pm
- Forum: Install / Compile
- Topic: No new precompiled versions?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 912
Re: No new precompiled versions?
For now I can build the app image locally. But I am not sure if I am able to upload the resulting files. Thanks, I will do the same for win. I set up a linux box with miniconda to attempt the same. I was going to try and modify triplus' Travis script. How do you make the AppImage locally. If you do...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:52 pm
- Forum: Developers corner
- Topic: Oldest Linux distro currently supported
- Replies: 5
- Views: 220
Re: Oldest Linux distro currently supported
Do we actually intend to support 16.04 right now, though, on the current master branch (and with the 0.19 release)? I'm having difficulty getting it to compile, and of course on 16.04 you only have python2/Qt4, which the wiki very much seems to indicate we don't actually support. Yes through the de...
- Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:20 pm
- Forum: Install / Compile
- Topic: No new precompiled versions?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 912
Re: No new precompiled versions?
Thanks! And of course take the time you need for yourself. A short hint here keeps us calm. Were there any github changes recently? I saw this as well I have thus far been unable to find the problem/solution, but I am looking. Also the OSX packaging is failing for another dependency related reason....