Search found 1992 matches

by Jee-Bee
Fri Mar 13, 2020 9:21 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0
Replies: 152
Views: 5752

Re: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0

vocx wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2020 4:53 am
The answer is evident. It is the next in line, 0.20.
You forgot the words "in my opinion" or "in my humble opinion".
by Jee-Bee
Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:18 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0
Replies: 152
Views: 5752

Re: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0

only first round is mentioned... don't know how much round there have been.
but still average $200 per working hour still 45000 working hours is about 2 years of work for more than 20 employees... you can do a serious amount of work in that time...
by Jee-Bee
Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:52 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0
Replies: 152
Views: 5752

Re: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0

The oldest CAD software i saw on wikipedia was NX (1973) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens_NX The newest CAD software is oneshape (2015 was the beta release) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onshape Oneshape started with $9 000 000 ( first round ) to give a bit of info what the could spend for the ...
by Jee-Bee
Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:25 am
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0
Replies: 152
Views: 5752

Re: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0

... It is already crear that you against a version number change. But than i have 2 questions to you: In general software (NOT FC!!) what makes a piece of software 1.0 ready what are the requirements . To what equaly type of software do you compare FC and what is the version number of that piece of...
by Jee-Bee
Wed Feb 26, 2020 12:19 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0
Replies: 152
Views: 5752

Re: Discussion: FreeCAD is not ready for 1.0

I don't know if i want to react on this topic... Basically it is mud throuwing everywhere. and why because of a version number. Yes i agree that from current mechanical enineering workflow (what is used a lot nowadays) FC can have some improvements! But that is not completly where FC is started. the...
by Jee-Bee
Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:56 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: CADCloud
Replies: 31
Views: 1008

Re: CADCloud

yorik wrote:
Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:26 pm
Just a cosmetic idea I had here, what would you think of allowing to use a same gradient background color as in FreeCAD? 8-)
the ugly '80 blue one :shock: :?
by Jee-Bee
Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:59 pm
Forum: Open discussion
Topic: [Pattern Features enhancing] : circular and linear pattern must support also fillets and chamfers
Replies: 52
Views: 1632

Re: [Pattern Features enhancing] : circular and linear pattern must support also fillets and chamfers

If you just tried one search action you had seen this is requested about 100 times...
but at this moment nobody is activly maintaining PDN... So if you have to do it yourself or you should wait till somebody thinks it is importand enough to do...
by Jee-Bee
Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:55 pm
Forum: FEM
Topic: Warnung bei der Gmesh Vernetzung
Replies: 9
Views: 275

Re: Warnung bei der Gmesh Vernetzung

You posted in English spoken forum... So ask your question in English!
by Jee-Bee
Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:59 am
Forum: CfdOF / CFD
Topic: Simulation does exit with error
Replies: 8
Views: 276

Re: Simulation does exit with error

please edit your question and use code brackets
use the button what looks like </>
by Jee-Bee
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:43 am
Forum: FEM
Topic: *SECTION PRINT implemented for volume elements
Replies: 18
Views: 519

Re: *SECTION PRINT implemented for volume elements

cool feature :D