Release notes for v0.19

Here's the place for discussion related to coding in FreeCAD, C++ or Python. Design, interfaces and structures.
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by uwestoehr »

Kunda1 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:37 pm What's the status of the Release notes?
I can only speak for these parts:
- Part
- PartDesign
- Mesh
- FEM
- Sketcher

I did all I could to update these sections. Maybe some new features are still missing, but there is no more I can do for now.

To me the page looks good and it is impressive. This release is such a huge progress :o

It would be cool if a native speaker could finally check the wording.
chrisb
Veteran
Posts: 54302
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:14 am

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by chrisb »

Who can add a qualified entry for needed changes due to Python upgrade?
See https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 88#p482146 .
A Sketcher Lecture with in-depth information is available in English, auf Deutsch, en français, en español.
User avatar
jonasb
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:57 pm

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by jonasb »

Sketcher's new ability of indicating fully constrained edges, even if the complete sketch is not yet fully constrained, is worth mentioning.
References:
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by uwestoehr »

jonasb wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:47 pm Sketcher's new ability of indicating fully constrained edges, even if the complete sketch is not yet fully constrained, is worth mentioning.
References:
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=53466
This one is now in: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/Release_not ... _Workbench

I don't know how to describe this properly, maybe someone else could help out?
User avatar
kkremitzki
Veteran
Posts: 2518
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:52 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by kkremitzki »

What is left before a release announcement?
Like my FreeCAD work? I'd appreciate any level of support via Patreon, Liberapay, or PayPal! Read more about what I do at my blog.
User avatar
Kunda1
Veteran
Posts: 13434
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:03 pm

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by Kunda1 »

kkremitzki wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:04 pm What is left before a release announcement?
Is anyone working on a 'demo reel' for v0.19?
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by uwestoehr »

kkremitzki wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:04 pm What is left before a release announcement?
Two things:
1. a Windows build of FC 0.19 that I could test. The build should use the Win installer and maybe I need to adapt the installer.
@sgrogan, do you have a build for me to test the installer?

2. I wonder why our main eyecatcher image for FC 0.19 is this one: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/File:FreeCA ... 9_main.jpg
It should be one that uses the new main feature of FC 0.19, meaning Link (assembly3 or 4).
User avatar
sgrogan
Veteran
Posts: 6499
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by sgrogan »

uwestoehr wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 7:24 pm 1. a Windows build of FC 0.19 that I could test. The build should use the Win installer and maybe I need to adapt the installer.
@sgrogan, do you have a build for me to test the installer?
I have been waiting for the Conda based build, which I I used for the installer for last couple of releases . The motivation for this is that the OSX .dmg, Linux .AppImage and Windows installer all share the same Libs.

Given the recent traffic in this thread https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 80#p477993 I am not sure of this anymore.

There is also a Tools > Measure distance problem with all the Libpack versions that works with the Conda build. I will look for the thread. I think its related to the Coin version.

I can build a release candidate installer from any of the 4 Windows builds here: https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/rele ... g/0.19_pre But which one? There seems to be an argument for/against any of them.
"fight the good fight"
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by uwestoehr »

sgrogan wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:02 pm Given the recent traffic in this thread https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 80#p477993 I am not sure of this anymore.
With the LibPack apeltauer provided on Saturday, 27th: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic. ... 77#p482477
everything works fine for me, also Tools->Measurement (or what is wrong with this?).
I run FC on 3 different computers, all with latest Win 10.

I can build a release candidate installer from any of the 4 Windows builds here: https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/rele ... g/0.19_pre But which one? There seems to be an argument for/against any of them.
Isn't the LibPack build from February 26th. If so, I encountered there bugs in the LibPack. So if you could provide a new build with apeltauer's latest LibPack, that would be nice. I will then take this and build a Win installer on top of it, just to test the installer and report back. OK to proceed?

Concerning what build. The latest LibPack 12.5.1 includes the fillet/chamfer OCC fix. Is this also included in the Conda build? If yes, and people report that Conda works fine for them, the Conda should be the choice.
User avatar
yorik
Founder
Posts: 13665
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:16 pm
Location: Brussels
Contact:

Re: Release notes for v0.19

Post by yorik »

In any case, I just had a thorough read of the 0.19 release notes, and it seems totally good for release to me...
Is someone interested in doing a release video? Otherwise I think we can go without.
Post Reply