Heads up, the 0.18.4 revision number should be 16145 not 16131sgrogan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 5:17 pm https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/releases/tag/0.18.4
I hope to fill it out by next weekend.
Back port commits to 0.18 branch
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
We need to disable the auto deploy for conda based builds based on looo's post above.
"fight the good fight"
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
I didn't mean to not create 0.18.4 builds which are hopefully uploaded soon.
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
It's good that we're ironing out all these details and getting better at releases.
where's our checklist for such things?
For example on my end:
manuall update the script that updates(*) the AppImage page which is actually updating 2 wiki templates:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD-Home ... b701266046
* The script only tracks the development version not stable.
where's our checklist for such things?
For example on my end:
manuall update the script that updates(*) the AppImage page which is actually updating 2 wiki templates:
- https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Templat ... or-Version
- https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/Template:Stable-Version
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD-Home ... b701266046
* The script only tracks the development version not stable.
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
My attempt to build 0.18.4 didn't succeed because of conda-build 3.18 introduced a slow-down during a library checking process and circle-ci stops the build because of "Too long with no output (exceeded 10m0s)".
ref.:
https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-bu ... issues/118
https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/3775
I will trigger the builds again once a new conda-build version is available.
edit.: After doing some modification to the build-scripts I was able to force conda using a conda-build-version other than 3.18.10. So 0.18.4 builds are uploaded and should be used for the next appimage/dmg.
ref.:
https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-bu ... issues/118
https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/3775
I will trigger the builds again once a new conda-build version is available.
edit.: After doing some modification to the build-scripts I was able to force conda using a conda-build-version other than 3.18.10. So 0.18.4 builds are uploaded and should be used for the next appimage/dmg.
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
"fight the good fight"
- kkremitzki
- Veteran
- Posts: 2517
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:52 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
As much as I love juggling these 5-digit numbers I can't wait until we get them out of our release version numbers and back to referring to development builds only.
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
Struggling with the weekly builds nearly every week, I didn't expect the old recipe to work out of the box...sgrogan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:58 pm https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/releases/tag/0.18.4 @looo is awesome!
Anyway osx is seeing brew-issues again. So this might need some time to be solved. (Last time we saw such errors it somehow got sorted by itself.)
https://travis-ci.org/FreeCAD/FreeCAD-A ... 7378#L3276
Hmm, I think it shouldn't be too difficult to change this. But I do not really feel responsible for this part and changing this might break other stuff too. So I guess it's best to ask @triplus or @kunda to make this change.kkremitzki wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:29 pm As much as I love juggling these 5-digit numbers I can't wait until we get them out of our release version numbers and back to referring to development builds only.
triplus wrote:
Kunda1 wrote:
Re: Back port commits to 0.18 branch
The stable builds shouldn't have revision numbers, IMO.
So I'm for removing them. Downstream package managers will adapt as well.
So I'm for removing them. Downstream package managers will adapt as well.
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs