Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Here's the place for discussion related to coding in FreeCAD, C++ or Python. Design, interfaces and structures.
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Respect the FreeCAD code of conduct!
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12849
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by bernd »

5355 is ok https://gitlab.com/freecad/FreeCAD-CI/-/commits/PR_5355 and 5357 fails https://gitlab.com/freecad/FreeCAD-CI/-/commits/PR_5357

as said master compiles automatically, but the PRs needs to pushed manually ATM.

bernd
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by uwestoehr »

uwestoehr wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:45 am
Roy_043 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:36 am Thanks for the new 0.19.3 version. The links in the Wiki have been updated. But https://www.freecadweb.org/downloads.php still links to the previous executable.
I know. I already updated the Website files in GitHub but Yorik is the only one who can sync the website with this. He is in vacation.
The Windows installer with Flatmesh included is now linked in our download section of the website.
User avatar
Roy_043
Veteran
Posts: 8450
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:28 pm

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by Roy_043 »

This PR is a candidate for backporting IMO:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/5388
Russ4262
Posts: 941
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:22 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by Russ4262 »

I suggest #5424 Path: Fixes 3D Pocket overcut on underside of selected faces for backport fix for Path WB.

Thanks,
Russell
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by uwestoehr »

Roy_043 wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:27 pm This PR is a candidate for backporting IMO:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/5388
Thanks. Is now backported.
Russ4262
Posts: 941
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:22 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by Russ4262 »

I suggest #5343 [Path] Fix open edge zero value start point for backport fix for Path WB.

Thanks,
Russell
User avatar
Kunda1
Veteran
Posts: 13434
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:03 pm

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by Kunda1 »

When are we releasing a new minor version ? We should because IIRC it will have at two CVE fixes (ref) that needs to be made available:
git commit ad6977f940d
git commit a73f442f8872
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by uwestoehr »

Kunda1 wrote: Sun Feb 13, 2022 12:32 pm When are we releasing a new minor version ? We should because IIRC it will have at two CVE fixes (ref) that needs to be made available:
git commit ad6977f940d
git commit a73f442f8872
I asked sliptonic and yorik and they think these are not urgent.
Before the next minor release I want to reolve some Win installer issues that recently popped up and Russ reported 2 PRs to be backported that have not yet been merged.
User avatar
Kunda1
Veteran
Posts: 13434
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:03 pm

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by Kunda1 »

uwestoehr wrote: Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:00 pm I asked sliptonic and yorik and they think these are not urgent.
Probably important for people using FreeCAD within a biz/org context. I think we should make a security release.
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
User avatar
uwestoehr
Veteran
Posts: 4961
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 3:21 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Back port commits to 0.19 branch

Post by uwestoehr »

Kunda1 wrote: Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:13 pm think we should make a security release.
Sorry, but when I ask the responsible persons and they said to me, not urgent, then why should I not trust them?

Making a release costs a lot of spare time and needs planning, time to build the installers/packages and of course testing, testing, testing. This is not "just done".
Post Reply