Not sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
Does the tool need to retract to the clearance height during linking moves?
Not sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
cahlfors wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:48 pm There definitely are. Not all tools are even able to plunge, like a face mill for instance. There is nothing in the center that can cut.
Also of interest here is to have the cutting area overshoot the outer boundaries. Hard to explain, but imagine you were cutting this by hand. Then you would not only start from outside of the stock, you would take a pass and proceed beyond it as well. That way you would leave no artifacts around the perimeter. Staying within the surface of either the stock or part would leave artifacts along the perimeter and especially in the corners as the tool would not cut clear all the way to the edge. Today, we manage this phenomenon by either faking the stock being bigger than it is, or by creating a helper object with a bigger surface. It would be so much easier if the function could handle this by itself.
Looking forward to using this function! Thanks a million for your effort!
Yes, it should retract, it's probably a bug, I will check it tomorrowdubstar-04 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pmNot sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
Crash.png
Does the tool need to retract to the clearance height during linking moves?
Hi Dan,kreso-t wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:11 pmYes, it should retract, it's probably a bug, I will check it tomorrowdubstar-04 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pmNot sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
Crash.png
Does the tool need to retract to the clearance height during linking moves?
BR,
K.
OK, got it now. I will correct that.kreso-t wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:16 amHi Dan,kreso-t wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:11 pmYes, it should retract, it's probably a bug, I will check it tomorrowdubstar-04 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pmNot sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
Crash.png
Does the tool need to retract to the clearance height during linking moves?
BR,
K.
I can't seem to reproduce this issue, with every settings I tried it always retracts. Do you maybe have this model saved with those settings that caused the problem?
Thx,
BR
This should be OK now.kreso-t wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:18 amOK, got it now. I will correct that.kreso-t wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:16 amHi Dan,kreso-t wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:11 pmYes, it should retract, it's probably a bug, I will check it tomorrowdubstar-04 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pmNot sure if you caught one of my previous posts regarding the adaptive path violating the model. See image:kreso-t wrote:
Crash.png
Does the tool need to retract to the clearance height during linking moves?
BR,
K.
I can't seem to reproduce this issue, with every settings I tried it always retracts. Do you maybe have this model saved with those settings that caused the problem?
Thx,
BR
BR,
K.
kreso-t wrote: This should be OK now.
Thanks Dan also to you for your testing efforts and suggestions.dubstar-04 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:27 pmkreso-t wrote: This should be OK now.
I will have a test over the weekend.
Thanks for all your effort on this!!
Overshooting the boundary is equally important here, as in face milling. Just don't overshoot into the material!
Hi,dubstar-04 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:54 pm ...
This would definitely be useful the test part for example:
Screenshot from 2018-08-26 20-13-24.png
This would benefit from starting machining from outside the stock and working inwards. That is what the HSM adaptive code would do.
Thanks,
Dan