Heidenhain Postprocessor

[sliptonic]

merged into master on May 8th.
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/3445

[chrisb]

If it is merged, shouldn't it occur in the current distribution? Mine is from 2020/06/17.

OS: macOS High Sierra (10.13)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.21671 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: master
Hash: f05253f882b336f56aae32593faa5676fd5aafdd
Python version: 3.8.2
Qt version: 5.12.5
Coin version: 4.0.0
OCC version: 7.4.0
Locale: C/Default (C)

[Kunda1]

Hi @Zibibbo84, heads up. According to LGTM there is a redundant assignment in code you introduced.
See https://lgtm.com/projects/g/FreeCAD/Fre ... atmap#L803
Here is the code on github:
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/comm ... 2014ffR805

Code: Select all

    # set the appropriate zero and direction of angle
    # with X axis zero have the Y+ direction
    if pol_Axis == "X":
        pol_Angle = 90 - pol_Angle
    # with Y axis zero have the Z+ direction
    elif pol_Axis == "Y":
        pol_Angle = pol_Angle
    # with Z axis zero have the X+ direction
    elif pol_Axis == "Z":
        pol_Angle = 90 - pol_Angle

pol_Angle = pol_Angle

[WilomanCZ]

Hello, I found this code before I came across yours, maybe it will help somehow.

https://gist.github.com/TurBoss/a9a0737 ... -heiden-py

Thank you very much for your work.
I only have one problem
Neither one can drill through the cycle and writes some madness there.

[chrisb]

Hi and welcome to the forum, thanks for the contribution!

I don't think we can use this directly, but it can serve as an example in the discussion of how to unify the postprocessors.

[Zibibbo84]

Hello, I found this code before I came across yours, maybe it will help somehow.

https://gist.github.com/TurBoss/a9a0737 ... -heiden-py

Thank you very much for your work.
I only have one problem
Neither one can drill through the cycle and writes some madness there.

what's the problem?
can you give me an example

[WilomanCZ]

Hello, I found this code before I came across yours, maybe it will help somehow.

https://gist.github.com/TurBoss/a9a0737 ... -heiden-py

Thank you very much for your work.
I only have one problem
Neither one can drill through the cycle and writes some madness there.

what's the problem?
can you give me an example

It do not generate drilling in normal HaidenHain cycle, i don't think the what it generate will actually work in real CNC machine, but i can be wrong.

PS: What version is with LBLs? And how activate it? Thanks

I think best is all thinks what i same for maby 2-xx holes or some shape is best to call it from LBL, beacuse you always know if one layer is ok so all others is good too and program will be smaller too.

In our company, they program everything that goes into LBL, even threaded cutters (milled), or even hole depths if there are more of them and it is also with drilling with slower speeds of the first few mm

I want use it just for teach myself programing in PC for CNC machine. But i need HaidenHain no ISO like is in FreeCAD

[Zibibbo84]

It do not generate drilling in normal HaidenHain cycle, i don't think the what it generate will actually work in real CNC machine, but i can be wrong.

PS: What version is with LBLs? And how activate it? Thanks

I think best is all thinks what i same for maby 2-xx holes or some shape is best to call it from LBL, beacuse you always know if one layer is ok so all others is good too and program will be smaller too.

In our company, they program everything that goes into LBL, even threaded cutters (milled), or even hole depths if there are more of them and it is also with drilling with slower speeds of the first few mm

I want use it just for teach myself programing in PC for CNC machine. But i need HaidenHain no ISO like is in FreeCAD

LBLs can be activated with post arguments, follow the quote below

Update:
Added Post Arguments
arguments.png

Fixed Little bugs
Cleaned some things

Update on first post

For cycles i haven't write code to replace it with LBLs they work only with multi level milling.
I don't know if i have time to implement this thing due to my job.
If you need you can do it by replacing CYCL DEF with a LBL and CYCL CALL with a CALL LBL using incremental values of Z.
I know it's an horrible solution but i can't do more now.

If you have a version of Heidenhain that have cycles 200 you can use the 205 to have a slower speed for some mm, i use it.

[Lsilva]

Any update on the post processor ?
Best regards

[nblbnk]

Hi Zibibbo84, can you share the file where you tried the postprocessor? Unfortunately i keep getting this error when i try myself: '_TempObject' object has no attribute 'Proxy'.