Understand... since i never looked in anything from the elmer solver i don't exactly understand what you mean... If you can explain it short nice otherwise i need to create time looking at the elmer solver code..
i have maybe a possible bug in the load
Moderator: bernd
Forum rules
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
Re: i have maybe a possible bug in the load
Re: i have maybe a possible bug in the load
Have a look at the FEM new solver example from start wb. The elmer solver only has a few attributes. All attributes in the regard of the analysis tiype are in separate equation objects. Just try to add them by selecting elmer solver and menu solve. This I would like to implement for CalculiX too. Afterwards there will be a new object. The time step. This will be between the main solver object and the equation object. A solver could have multiple time step objects. They just will be calculated one by one. Any time step object itself needs at least one equation object to know how to calculate. In the time step object e define what to calculate.
Re: i have maybe a possible bug in the load
I found this one (i assume one of my first FEM topics). Shall i create a Bug report since it is not fixed( yet)?
Re: i have maybe a possible bug in the load
There are many posts ... Is it still about force constraint not beeing written for frequency? Have you tested latest master?
Re: i have maybe a possible bug in the load
I had tested it with
Code: Select all
OS: Windows 7 SP 1 (6.1)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.21514 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: master
Hash: 89ddab33f692a9bd739171689f9ab0eb58d64b35
Python version: 3.6.8
Qt version: 5.12.1
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.3.0
Locale: Dutch/Netherlands (nl_NL)[\code]
I shall test it later today with current version