attached screens of two cubes show the problem much better ... the intersection solid is missing if the boolean fragments solid are taken.
FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
Moderator: bernd
Forum rules
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
the file ...
Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
The question is what to to from user point of view ... One solution would be only define the solids for all the attached chips and leave the rest without solid definition, which means all other elements will get this material.
Attached your model ...
I'm thinking if i find some check for this kind of problem ...
Attached your model ...
I'm thinking if i find some check for this kind of problem ...
Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
Another way would be just fix the geometry. Attached the file.
@easyw-fc: I use your manipolator workbench, which was on my ThisWorkbenchIneedToInstallAndPlay with for a long time. Today I did install and play with it with success It's a great tool !!!
Ahh, do not forget to remesh after fixing the geometry.
@easyw-fc: I use your manipolator workbench, which was on my ThisWorkbenchIneedToInstallAndPlay with for a long time. Today I did install and play with it with success It's a great tool !!!
Ahh, do not forget to remesh after fixing the geometry.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 12:06 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
Hi @bernd
thanks for the file
I tried to do a temperature analysis but I couldn't let it works...
Here the file
Thanks a lot! BTW Your FEM WB is brilliant!
Maurice
Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge
The order does not matter. The problem was lower solid was 0.04 mm inside the huge solid. Thus the boolean fragments created 4 solids out of the three. For the fourth solid there where no material assigned. What I did was alligning the solids with manipulator workbench exact face on face. Thus the boolean fragment does not create a fourth solid anymore. Thus defining material for all three solids works fine. Hope I could get you the point.thschrader wrote: ↑Sat Dec 22, 2018 3:10 pmI see that you have only changed the order of the subbodies in BooleanFragments.
Right? Why does it work with another order?
changed_order.JPG
bernd