FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

About the development of the FEM module/workbench.

Moderator: bernd

User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by bernd »

attached screens of two cubes show the problem much better ... the intersection solid is missing if the boolean fragments solid are taken.

Screenshot_20181221_212853.png
Screenshot_20181221_212853.png (79.01 KiB) Viewed 856 times

Screenshot_20181221_212950.png
Screenshot_20181221_212950.png (77.85 KiB) Viewed 856 times

Screenshot_20181221_213128.png
Screenshot_20181221_213128.png (262.97 KiB) Viewed 856 times
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by bernd »

the file ...

multimaterial-intersection01.fcstd
(71.63 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by bernd »

The question is what to to from user point of view ... One solution would be only define the solids for all the attached chips and leave the rest without solid definition, which means all other elements will get this material.

Attached your model ...

material-problem-simplified-works.FCStd
(799.28 KiB) Downloaded 48 times

I'm thinking if i find some check for this kind of problem ...
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by bernd »

Another way would be just fix the geometry. Attached the file.

@easyw-fc: I use your manipolator workbench, which was on my ThisWorkbenchIneedToInstallAndPlay with for a long time. Today I did install and play with it with success :D It's a great tool !!!

Ahh, do not forget to remesh after fixing the geometry.

material-problem-simplified-fixed_geometry.FCStd
(834.01 KiB) Downloaded 54 times
thschrader
Veteran
Posts: 3157
Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 12:06 pm
Location: Germany

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by thschrader »

bernd wrote: Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:17 am Another way would be just fix the geometry. Attached the file.
I see that you have only changed the order of the subbodies in BooleanFragments.
Right? Why does it work with another order? :o
changed_order.JPG
changed_order.JPG (22.44 KiB) Viewed 811 times
User avatar
easyw-fc
Veteran
Posts: 3633
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:34 am

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by easyw-fc »

bernd wrote: Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:17 am Another way would be just fix the geometry. Attached the file.
material-problem-simplified-fixed_geometry.FCStd
Hi @bernd
thanks for the file
I tried to do a temperature analysis but I couldn't let it works...
Here the file
bernd wrote: Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:17 am @easyw-fc: I use your manipolator workbench, which was on my ThisWorkbenchIneedToInstallAndPlay with for a long time. Today I did install and play with it with success :D It's a great tool !!!
Thanks a lot! BTW Your FEM WB is brilliant! :D
Maurice
User avatar
bernd
Veteran
Posts: 12851
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: FEM Thermal Analysis of a PCB: a new challenge

Post by bernd »

thschrader wrote: Sat Dec 22, 2018 3:10 pm
bernd wrote: Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:17 am Another way would be just fix the geometry. Attached the file.
I see that you have only changed the order of the subbodies in BooleanFragments.
Right? Why does it work with another order? :o
changed_order.JPG
The order does not matter. The problem was lower solid was 0.04 mm inside the huge solid. Thus the boolean fragments created 4 solids out of the three. For the fourth solid there where no material assigned. What I did was alligning the solids with manipulator workbench exact face on face. Thus the boolean fragment does not create a fourth solid anymore. Thus defining material for all three solids works fine. Hope I could get you the point.

bernd
Post Reply