My proposal on https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=44852
I have a problem with constraint multiplication. Can you tell me where my error is please?
http://help-freecad-jpg87.fr/02assembla ... layer.html
My proposal on https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=44852
I have a problem with constraint multiplication. Can you tell me where my error is please?
and the multiplication of constraints works normally!
Right, that should be a recent version. But there is still some problem. I just fixed handling of undo/redo multiplication. BTW, the multiplication function is enhanced so that you don't need to manually convert the part into a Link. It will do it automatically, and the array elements are by default not shown, but instead grouping the original part under the converted link.
I just updated the package to match the current tip of the repo.realthunder wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:11 pm Right, that should be a recent version. But there is still some problem. I just fixed handling of undo/redo multiplication.
Will that cause some licensing issue? I plan to seek for some alternative of the Slovespace solver with a compatible license, or write one myself if necessary, although that is not high in my todo list. Hopefully can be done before the next FC release.
I am talking only about the bundles, so no there should be no problem (as we discussed in the past). It's the same as if you install solvespace + asm3 via a package-manager. We only have to make sure the licences are also bundled.kkremitzki wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 12:43 am It would be fine if the workbench itself were LGPL and required the user to install Solvespace separately.
Yes, we can setup a variant which builds freecad from your fork (If that is what you want). But this will double the build-matrix, and we are currently already using too much space at anaconda.org. So I think it's best to limitate such services to the master branch of freecad.realthunder wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 10:40 pm Maybe another approach will be safer. I am planning to make regular release of my fork from now on, since most of the features are likely to land in FC in the next release, better get wider range of tests before merging. Maybe you can help with that?
+1 for getting it the add-on manager.looo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:13 pmI just updated the package to match the current tip of the repo.realthunder wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:11 pm Right, that should be a recent version. But there is still some problem. I just fixed handling of undo/redo multiplication.
@realthunder What do you think about including asm3 in a 0.19 release? Should we do that or should we use the addon-manager to let people install asm3?
Better to join this effort then:realthunder wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 10:40 pm or write one myself if necessary, although that is not high in my todo list