I updated the freecad.asm-feedstock so this should be available in the next updates.
Thanks for the heads-up!
I updated the freecad.asm-feedstock so this should be available in the next updates.
I know I know, it's just that the upstream appimage is 810 MBs (yours is 458) while the .deb packages are a fraction of that. If asm3 wasn't included in the official development appimage then I would not be asking this, but seeing as it is, it must mean that there are few to no obstacles remaining from having it work with upstream. I guess I should be talking to the packagers of the tje FreeCad-Daily ppa and asking them instead.realthunder wrote: ↑Sat Sep 26, 2020 7:39 am You can use the upstream AppImage which includes everything I believe. You can update AppImage as well using Preference->AppImage dialog. Or you can try my personal release of AppImage, which contains lots of extra features. I usually sync with upstream master every month or two.
RTFM ! this has been explained thousands of times: use <<label>>
Thanks for the pointer. You have to appreciate, there is a wast amount of information, and things are easily missed.
The next release will have an improvement on expression auto complete. Just type any keyword from the label it will show item with << >>, so no need to explicitly type that.
Brilliant news.realthunder wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:57 am ]The next release will have an improvement on expression auto complete. Just type any keyword from the label it will show item with << >>, so no need to explicitly type that.
That sounds fantastic. Can't wait for the next releaserealthunder wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:57 am The next release will have an improvement on expression auto complete. Just type any keyword from the label it will show item with << >>, so no need to explicitly type that.
That Attachment6 itself is not going to be cheap to solve, probably require an actual algebra solver. Granted that solving for a single pair of parts is relatively easy, but that's against the idea of using Attachment, which just requires simple matrix operations.catman wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 6:09 pm Then the part is mated with exactly 6 DOF by reducing the redundancy once. In the tree all 6 Elements are listed under the "Attachment6" constraint.
There is one issue to be solved: there are 3 solutions for each side to place the LCS axes. One way is to define the z-axis by the first plane the other is to allow randomness and provide a button to toggle through the two other choices quicky. Or both.
I would like to invite comments on whether or not that would be considered an useful addition. And also, of course, an information on whether or not that would be a feasible extension for ASM3.