Thank you Yorik.yorik wrote: ↑Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:32 pm The absolute majority of people who contribute a lot to the wiki are not the same people who touch the source code. And the contents in our wiki are pretty reasonable, compared to other projects. Not the best doc in the world, but far from the worst too. If we switched away from that, it's simple: we would hardly have any more new documentation. That's how FreeCAD works, some do the programming, others do community support (here, basically), and others manage documentation.
(...)
Of course we shouldn't go for anything that will prevent the level of accessibility and "translatability" that our current wiki has.
I understand the other issues, but if going the git way reduces accessibility and reduces translation capability, how exactly is it an improvement? More importantly, for whom? I have yet to see someone present us with a Git alternative that would keep our accessibility and translation capability.
Yorik's gitbook was left aside in favour of a MediaWiki version. Why was that?