Excellent! Thanks! I'll have a look at hwat OCC gives us, but this gives us already a good start.

Wow looks great. Since I'm on the out of home for a few days more comments in this regard later on ... just regarding the quadratic moments (moment of inertia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia)

try one of these:yorik wrote:...

A little question that annoys me, the pybar files needs the quadratic moments from the sections of the structural members. Calculating that is not hard for rectangular sections, but we should have something that works for any kind of section. Anyone of you engineering gurus has an idea on the subject?

Code: Select all

```
import Part
box = Part.makeBox(1,10,5)
Part.show(box)
box.StaticMoments
box.MatrixOfInertia
```

Hi, I'm a bit rusty at this, but the real difficulty is to determine the torsional moment of inertia for non simple sections.

Maybe the FEM module could be used to numerically evaluate it.

Anyway I'm interested on the work beeing done here, at some point I would like to integrate Frame3dd.sf.net in freecad, unfortunately it may be in a not so close future.

Ciao

Maybe the FEM module could be used to numerically evaluate it.

Anyway I'm interested on the work beeing done here, at some point I would like to integrate Frame3dd.sf.net in freecad, unfortunately it may be in a not so close future.

Ciao

haha it would have been so easy.box.MatrixOfInertia

this should be the z value in the 3. row in MatrixOfInertia. Also the polar Moment could be calculated with the same method I have posted before, using gauss to reduce the area integral to the boundary. But as r^2 = x^2 +y^2 the polar Moment becomes simple the sum of Ix + Iy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_mo ... is_theoremHi, I'm a bit rusty at this, but the real difficulty is to determine the torsional moment of inertia for non simple sections.

please help with my conda-packaging efforts: https://liberapay.com/looooo/

I was referring to this: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TorsionalRigidity.html

I see, this task is a bit more difficultI was referring to this: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TorsionalRigidity.html

You are right, maybe the calculix heat-equation could be (ab)used for this task.Maybe the FEM module could be used to numerically evaluate it.

please help with my conda-packaging efforts: https://liberapay.com/looooo/

yorik wrote:After a long time, some updates on this subject!

That would sure be needed!yorik wrote:... I'm trying to convince him to make pybar translatable...

Would be very useful for Beam FEM in FemModul as well.yorik wrote:... I'm planning to:

- Add a couple of tools to edit the structural nodes of the Arch structures, so one can make them meet

Definition of constraints of the structural elements to each other (joints) and the constraints of the structure (supports) is needed too. All this could be used later in Fem too (Fem Constraints could be generated out of the Definitions in Arch). But as you wrote all this is another story only worth to go if first steps are sucessful.yorik wrote: After that we could look at how we could define loads on the Arch structures (that could be used in FEM too), but that's another story...

...

How about the face axis? They would be very useful for Shell FEM in FemModule as well.yorik wrote:Yes, we could upgrade the system... It could even be pretty simple, use the same Nodes property, since we only need 2 vectors to define a plane. Then, depending on the role of the element, we show a line/polyline or a plane.

For Beam and Shell FEM see viewtopic.php?f=18&t=11196#p92590

Yes I noticed the 1D object in FEM, but didn't look any further... I really need to start playing with it.

Very cool how all these areas converge, sooner or later they will blend

Very cool how all these areas converge, sooner or later they will blend

I would like trying to calculate the same structure you calculated in pypar in FemWB. In FEMWB we will not get the wonderful bending moment and force diagramms of pybar but the deformation will be comparable.

To mesh the structure gmsh needs a shape which will be exported to step. See viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11182#p92187 Is there any possibility to get a shape (edges) out of the structural ArchAxis?

To mesh the structure gmsh needs a shape which will be exported to step. See viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11182#p92187 Is there any possibility to get a shape (edges) out of the structural ArchAxis?

Yes, easily, I could add a method for that, but basically it would be just this:bernd wrote: To mesh the structure gmsh needs a shape which will be exported to step. See viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11182#p92187 Is there any possibility to get a shape (edges) out of the structural ArchAxis?

Code: Select all

`Part.makePolygon(myObj.Nodes)`