Yes i did and all the rest of them in the past few years regarding this area. But until the end of the week i can't do any work on this as i don't have the time. I would especially like to test this first and have some data before dismissing multiCommon effort altogether:wmayer wrote:Have you ever checked my last posting? What I telling you is that the method multiCommon (and multSection) returns a different result for OCC 6.9 compared to OCC6.8.
As for:Secondly, this makes the function obsolete because one can fuse the tool shapes with multiFuse() and then do the difference with cut() which has no or a negligible performance penalty.
I guess multiCommon (and multiSection) method can change in a way only OCC 6.9 and up is supported. But you said you would like to have OCC 6.8 behaviour for multiCommon method to make sense to you? Therefore here it would make sense to gather some info on why OCC changed this (hence opening issue report or searching elsewhere for the information).For 6.9 it does this: s1 AND (s2 OR s2)
For 6.8 it does this: s1 AND s2 AND s2
Or are you telling me you changed your mind based on the discussion conducted and do see multiCommon as viable option? But only for the OCC 6.9 or above? The reason i ask is i will try to focus on the remaining issues and provide answers over the weekend before we dismiss anything too quickly.