Isn't pivoting a pad casual?
Forum rules
and Helpful information
and Helpful information
IMPORTANT: Please click here and read this first, before asking for help
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: Isn't pivoting a pad casual?
Search the wiki for Dependency Graph. Although it's a separate program, it is pretty standard. A FreeCAD builtin replacement is the DAG view.
A Sketcher Lecture with in-depth information is available in English, auf Deutsch, en français, en español.
- papyblaise
- Veteran
- Posts: 8001
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: Isn't pivoting a pad casual?
I don't see the relationship between the position of objects and the dependency graph, in 25 years I've never used it and I'm fine
when you move an object using "Attachment > Placement", it is positioned where you place it, but the next one is repositioned on the general system, you have to move it too
when you move an object using "Attachment > Placement", it is positioned where you place it, but the next one is repositioned on the general system, you have to move it too
Re: Isn't pivoting a pad casual?
The dependency graph in this instance highlights the fact that the OP has been attaching to out of body planes and using inappropriate attachment modes...
I would agree that it is not necessary normally, but it is a simple way to highlight these problems in this case.
I would agree that it is not necessary normally, but it is a simple way to highlight these problems in this case.