Ok, so I got a lot more response than I expected.. and a lot faster.
Replying to the comments (out of respect for the time you guys took to make them):
papyblaise wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Erase all inusful sketch , use Hole instate of pocket : the cone became automaticly , and chanfer
I used pocket and included the cone because this is a 3D print - those are critical elements to the design, I'm afraid.
Bance wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 8:52 am
Better to remain in PD, use subtractive cone and chamfer.
I may revisit that - Getting the cone subtraction to work properly was really tricky. Clearly, I was mixing Part and PartDesign elements, which lies at the source of my problem.
openBrain wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 5:57 am
This is clear from the Dependency Graph.
You have a Part/Chamfer applied on the PartDesign/Pocket.
I initally went loking for the chamfer in PD, but didn't see it, so I tried the Part chamfer. Took another look and found it. Otherwise, applying the chamfer to the cut object is obviously the quickest fix. I suspect it would be better for me to do it entirely in PartDesign.
Gregory son of Carl wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 3:48 am
I think what happened here is that you accidentally selected edges from the PartDesign body for chamfering instead of from the Cut feature on top which looks to be the cause of that error message. To clean things up a bit, you can change the "Base" object Parameter for the chamfer to the Cut object.
To deselect the chamfer edges in its current state, you need to make the PartDesign body visible before activating the chamfer Task window.
I took a look at this. Your solution works, but I discovered I can't pick "Cut" as base when creating that chamfer initially. I have to choose Pocket, then go back and change it to base after applying the chamfer. That said, once I did that and hid the Cut object, the model appears as it should. Clearly, mixing Part / PD elements is the source of my issue.