how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Forum rules
and Helpful information
and Helpful information
IMPORTANT: Please click here and read this first, before asking for help
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
See also:
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=60196
I think I have already found the issue in the code. But have yet to submit a PR.
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=60196
I think I have already found the issue in the code. But have yet to submit a PR.
- thomas-neemann
- Veteran
- Posts: 11955
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:03 pm
- Location: Osnabrück DE 🇩🇪
- Contact:
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Thanks for mentioning. It seems that realthunder's fork is (now) completely separate. I did not realize that before. Or is there a similar PR for the main branch?
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Hmm...what does mean and where are the details.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Up to now my understanding was that RT's fork would one day be completely merged with the main branch. But this PR seems to suggest that this may never happen. I do not have more details, but I do not see this PR in the main branch. I hope I am wrong, because having two competing branches of FreeCAD can't be good.
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
hmm...seems something of this nature should deserve a clear statement, rather than conjecture reading a PR.Roy_043 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 12:17 pm Up to now my understanding was that RT's fork would one day be completely merged with the main branch. But this PR seems to suggest that this may never happen. I do not have more details, but I do not see this PR in the main branch. I hope I am wrong, because having two competing branches of FreeCAD can't be good.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Well maybe you can clarify the differences between:
https://github.com/realthunder/FreeCAD/ ... /Mod/Draft
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/tree ... /Mod/Draft
Things seem to be out of sync.
https://github.com/realthunder/FreeCAD/ ... /Mod/Draft
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/tree ... /Mod/Draft
Things seem to be out of sync.
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
Code: Select all
This branch is 4127 commits ahead, 1394 commits behind FreeCAD:master.
Gene
- thomas-neemann
- Veteran
- Posts: 11955
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:03 pm
- Location: Osnabrück DE 🇩🇪
- Contact:
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
If I remember correctly, Reathunder regularly merge the master version into its version.
there is now the new version that solves the problem of this topic
https://github.com/realthunder/FreeCAD_ ... 3/releases
Re: how to place a draft WB working plane on transformed body face
The delta is continually expanding.
I see the difference in the PR as noted.
I see there is a new release of the RT fork.
I see that master is merged to the RT, apparently regularly.
But, making statements like: "It seems that realthunder's fork is (now) completely separate." has a LOT of far reaching implications for both master and the RT fork.
If, indeed, the RT fork is now going to continue to diverge (at seemingly ever increasing rate), people need some way to decide which they are going rely on. Many are already are choosing to go with an arguably more modern looking, more "neat" features, and at least the mitigation of the TNP issue in the RT fork, even though it only has one guy working on it. And leaves those using the master wondering if the apparent stasis is temporary, permanent, or other.
At this point it seems there is just speculation.
I see the difference in the PR as noted.
I see there is a new release of the RT fork.
I see that master is merged to the RT, apparently regularly.
But, making statements like: "It seems that realthunder's fork is (now) completely separate." has a LOT of far reaching implications for both master and the RT fork.
If, indeed, the RT fork is now going to continue to diverge (at seemingly ever increasing rate), people need some way to decide which they are going rely on. Many are already are choosing to go with an arguably more modern looking, more "neat" features, and at least the mitigation of the TNP issue in the RT fork, even though it only has one guy working on it. And leaves those using the master wondering if the apparent stasis is temporary, permanent, or other.
At this point it seems there is just speculation.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."