Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.

[koirat]

So here I have got a fully constrained sketch of double sided ring spanner.
There are no errors on sketch or pad.

Problem is only one ring appears as a hole.

RingSpannerBug.png (5.05 KiB) Viewed 1515 times

SplineShafRingSpanner.FCStd

(51.65 KiB) Downloaded 43 times

[thomas-neemann]

one sketch is double, if i erase half of it, it works for me

[koirat]

one sketch is double, if i erase half of it, it works for me

Thank you.

[drmacro]

Just for contrast, here is a version with a much simpler way to create the hole sketches with simpler geometry and taking advantage of polar symmetry.
(And I corrected the mutiple geometries you had created...)

The 2 SplineShaftRing sketches are now much easier to read and maintain. After I completed SplineShaftRing1Sketch, I simply did a CarbonCopy of it in SplineShaftRing2Sketch and changed the two diameter values.

Makes your work easier.

Snip macro screenshot-35eaf3.png (115.67 KiB) Viewed 1388 times

[koirat]

I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.

When I open the project I see it properly but when I double click on sketch and than close, it breaks and show 3 occurrences instead of 6. (the same is when I do recompute object on polar pattern)

Thank you for your effort but there is actually a reason why I'm not using a PolarPattern in this case, I use this sketch pattern in some other sketches by carbon copying.

Still as you have noticed my sketch is overly complicated, sadly speaking I had some problems with over-constraining when I have tried to make it more readable. This is why I ended up making it the ugly way.

[drmacro]

I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.

When I open the project I see it properly but when I double click on sketch and than close, it breaks and show 3 occurrences instead of 6. (the same is when I do recompute object on polar pattern)

Nope, still all set to 6 here...

And, if I download the uploaded file and open the download version, they are set to 6...

Could be because I'm using 0.20.

Thank you for your effort but there is actually a reason why I'm not using a PolarPattern in this case, I use this sketch pattern in some other sketches by carbon copying.

Still as you have noticed my sketch is overly complicated, sadly speaking I had some problems with over-constraining when I have tried to make it more readable. This is why I ended up making it the ugly way.

I used carbon copy between the sketches as well. I don't see the problem...work smart, not hard.

[Shalmeneser]

I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.

It's an old bug (keeping to 3), now repaired.

[Shalmeneser]

More simple.

[Syres]

I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.

It's an old bug (keeping to 3), now repaired.

No, the facts are not being made clear, the bug was 0.20 reading in 0.19 polar and linear patterns incorrectly. Show me where the documentation states 0.19 should read in 0.20 files, because backwards compatibility is a bonus not mandatory?

[Shalmeneser]

No, the facts are not being made clear, the bug was 0.20 reading in 0.19 polar and linear patterns incorrectly. Show me where the documentation states 0.19 should read in 0.20 files, because backwards compatibility is a bonus not mandatory?

What's the version of the FC file ?
What's the version of the FC reader ?