Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
Forum rules
and Helpful information
and Helpful information
IMPORTANT: Please click here and read this first, before asking for help
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Also, be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
So here I have got a fully constrained sketch of double sided ring spanner.
There are no errors on sketch or pad.
Problem is only one ring appears as a hole.
There are no errors on sketch or pad.
Problem is only one ring appears as a hole.
- thomas-neemann
- Veteran
- Posts: 11919
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:03 pm
- Location: Osnabrück DE 🇩🇪
- Contact:
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
one sketch is double, if i erase half of it, it works for me
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
Thank you.thomas-neemann wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:09 pm one sketch is double, if i erase half of it, it works for me
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
Just for contrast, here is a version with a much simpler way to create the hole sketches with simpler geometry and taking advantage of polar symmetry.
(And I corrected the mutiple geometries you had created...)
The 2 SplineShaftRing sketches are now much easier to read and maintain. After I completed SplineShaftRing1Sketch, I simply did a CarbonCopy of it in SplineShaftRing2Sketch and changed the two diameter values.
Makes your work easier.
(And I corrected the mutiple geometries you had created...)
The 2 SplineShaftRing sketches are now much easier to read and maintain. After I completed SplineShaftRing1Sketch, I simply did a CarbonCopy of it in SplineShaftRing2Sketch and changed the two diameter values.
Makes your work easier.
- Attachments
-
- SplineShafRingSpanner-mac.FCStd
- (86.93 KiB) Downloaded 33 times
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.
When I open the project I see it properly but when I double click on sketch and than close, it breaks and show 3 occurrences instead of 6. (the same is when I do recompute object on polar pattern)
Thank you for your effort but there is actually a reason why I'm not using a PolarPattern in this case, I use this sketch pattern in some other sketches by carbon copying.
Still as you have noticed my sketch is overly complicated, sadly speaking I had some problems with over-constraining when I have tried to make it more readable. This is why I ended up making it the ugly way.
When I open the project I see it properly but when I double click on sketch and than close, it breaks and show 3 occurrences instead of 6. (the same is when I do recompute object on polar pattern)
Thank you for your effort but there is actually a reason why I'm not using a PolarPattern in this case, I use this sketch pattern in some other sketches by carbon copying.
Still as you have noticed my sketch is overly complicated, sadly speaking I had some problems with over-constraining when I have tried to make it more readable. This is why I ended up making it the ugly way.
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
Nope, still all set to 6 here...koirat wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:07 pm I might have found a BUG, or you have changed PolarPattern occurrence to 3 and saved it.
When I open the project I see it properly but when I double click on sketch and than close, it breaks and show 3 occurrences instead of 6. (the same is when I do recompute object on polar pattern)
And, if I download the uploaded file and open the download version, they are set to 6...
Could be because I'm using 0.20.
I used carbon copy between the sketches as well. I don't see the problem...work smart, not hard.Thank you for your effort but there is actually a reason why I'm not using a PolarPattern in this case, I use this sketch pattern in some other sketches by carbon copying.
Still as you have noticed my sketch is overly complicated, sadly speaking I had some problems with over-constraining when I have tried to make it more readable. This is why I ended up making it the ugly way.
Last edited by drmacro on Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9560
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
It's an old bug (keeping to 3), now repaired.
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9560
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
More simple.
- Attachments
-
- SplineShafRingSpanner-mac_SHALM.FCStd
- (55.4 KiB) Downloaded 28 times
-
- Capture du 2021-10-16 21-33-16.png (12.93 KiB) Viewed 1276 times
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
No, the facts are not being made clear, the bug was 0.20 reading in 0.19 polar and linear patterns incorrectly. Show me where the documentation states 0.19 should read in 0.20 files, because backwards compatibility is a bonus not mandatory?
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9560
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Fully constrained sketch no errors but missing hole.
What's the version of the FC file ?
What's the version of the FC reader ?