Deflection in Faces

[user1234]

Does not matter if SSD, except you run out of RAM and swap in the SSD, which will ruin it. ARM Processor? Compile it yourself? Tesselation settings?

Have you singularities in your models? This is was also meshing do not like. I made a defect model with singularities.

0.png (13.63 KiB) Viewed 395 times

- with 0.1% and 1° tessellation --> 20min --> =+ 3.3GByte RAM
- with 1% and 1° --> 10seconds --> RAM increase not noticeable

Without singularities errors:

- with 0.1% and 1° --> 2min --> =+1.5GByte
- with 1% and 1° --> 1 second --> RAM increase not noticeable

Just try to set the tessellation unnecessary rough to test and reduce the issues possibilities. For example here:

1.png (80.26 KiB) Viewed 395 times

and here

2.png (50.77 KiB) Viewed 395 times

. Just said, it is only a visibility settings, no geometry.

Greetings
user1234

[adrianinsaval]

Does not matter if SSD

hhmm I would expect file load to be faster with an SSD, tessellation not necessarily. Are the shapes tessellated at file load? I thought the tessellated shape was also stored in the file.

[MRx]

the deviation settings are all okay (0.8% / 28.5°), the time it takes is usually opencascade loading time. I have crosschecked the loading time via C++ API back then.
BREP structures can be blown up from time to time, downgrading / upgrading the object in the draft workbench can separate dependencies which cause some heavy calculations it seems.
I do not know the details about the BREP file format, I did not have a look at that.

[user1234]

I thought the tessellated shape was also stored in the file.

No. then the files would be one or two magnitude bigger.

0.8% / 28.5°

That is for an macbook (laptop) too fine. I would set it to at least to 2%/10°. That sound too much, but in fact it is not that bad as it sounds and the visual difference it not that much. But the calculating speed increases extreme. The calculating time increases with the fineness approximately with between 2nd and 3rd potency (rough estimate, depend on the geometry).

I have set it on my workstation 5% and 10°. I only see that on freeform surfaces. And if i want it finer, then i set it in the properties per part finer. Then i also can quickly see, if it has an impact in the calculating time.

In commercial CADs, it is also often pretty rough set. Mostly around 2% and 15° or more (if you can set it, this is not always the case). But often there runs a visual graphic filter over it and then it looks shinier and the edges of the mesh are not that noticeable, only when you now them and look a little bit more accurate as normal.

Greetings
user1234