Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Have some feature requests, feedback, cool stuff to share, or want to know where FreeCAD is going? This is the place.
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
br4n_d0n
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:00 pm

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by br4n_d0n »

Thanks for the help and @Shalmeneser for sharing some files that I can look at the tree view in order to get a history of sorts
User avatar
adrianinsaval
Veteran
Posts: 5544
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by adrianinsaval »

Additionally, if the model is symmetrical I would model only half of it and then do a mirror
User avatar
Shalmeneser
Veteran
Posts: 9545
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
Location: Fr

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by Shalmeneser »

adrianinsaval wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:28 pm Additionally, if the model is symmetrical I would model only half of it and then do a mirror
Mirror :
* top : no
* front : ok
User avatar
M4x
Veteran
Posts: 1479
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:23 am
Location: Germany

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by M4x »

Shalmeneser wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:04 pm Mirror :
* top : no
* front : ok
Could you explain this a little bit more in detail please?
drmacro
Veteran
Posts: 8975
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:35 pm

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by drmacro »

M4x wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2021 5:14 am
Shalmeneser wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:04 pm Mirror :
* top : no
* front : ok
Could you explain this a little bit more in detail please?
Yes, please?
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan: Spock: "...His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
TheMarkster
Veteran
Posts: 5508
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 1:53 am

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by TheMarkster »

Is mirroring always advised even with very simple models like this? To me there is a tradeoff between having more objects in the tree and more elements in a sketch. Shalm's approach seems optimal to me in this particular case. One pad, one pocket, done.

I offer this alternative only to show how we can use Part::Face tool in Part Design for cases where Pocket's internal facemaker cannot cope with nested wires. Part::Face tool uses by default Part::FaceMakerBullseye as its facemaker where the Part Design tools generally use Part::FaceMakerCheese, which cannot manage nested internal wires. But if we make the face for the Part Design tool it will use that face readily enough.

Usage: select the sketch and use the Part::Face (face from wires) tool to make the face. Select the Body, edit the Group property to include the Face object. Select the Face, then use it to do the Pocket.
Snip macro screenshot-b4fd01.png
Snip macro screenshot-b4fd01.png (68.07 KiB) Viewed 1265 times
Snip macro screenshot-47eb32.png
Snip macro screenshot-47eb32.png (25.59 KiB) Viewed 1265 times
I include a techdraw page to show how the dd properties are used in the model and because I need practice with techdraw.
Snip macro screenshot-c1ee52.png
Snip macro screenshot-c1ee52.png (75.38 KiB) Viewed 1265 times
Attachments
bullseye_test.FCStd
(33.94 KiB) Downloaded 24 times
User avatar
Shalmeneser
Veteran
Posts: 9545
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
Location: Fr

Re: Need some thoughts on modeling approach

Post by Shalmeneser »

M4x wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2021 5:14 am Mirror :
* top : no
* front : ok
Could you explain this a little bit more in detail please?
The top sketch doesn't need a mirror because the complete figure is easier than half of it.
The front sketch can be mirrored.
Post Reply