Regarding task window, agree. need to take a look at it.
Regarding inch fasteners, these can be great upgrade. Should be in a separate code file, though, to not break the integration with ulrich's code.
I want to add a usable compliment of inch based fasteners to the WB before I make a PR. The ToDo list looks something like this:
Hmm. currently I have just been adding into the screw_maker file. However, I would say that I have not actually broken the integration with Ulrich's code so far. For example, I was able to bring my fork in line with the recent changes to nut thread generation with minimal effort (see https://github.com/slowinternets/FreeCA ... 8c99b52d32 ). What about the additional types of fasteners (ISO 402X, ISO 7379, DIN 7984) that have already been added on top of the screw_maker macro? At your option, I can rework the changes to interfere less with the macro, but it isn't my preference.
It's so great that you debloated ScrewMaker.py. That is awesome.
The drawing is created by TechDraw, so the Fastener Workbench is not responsible for this. This topic has been requested a lot, however, it's not so easy to tackle because TechDraw doesn't really understand the 3D object; it just sees a collection of "edges", it doesn't know that a feature is a "hole" or another thing. It just sees "edges with so and so coordinates" and it displays those.Giulio Buccini wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:29 pm...
1. a "simplified" view (like in the image above) that can be correctly interpreted by Techdraw WB,
2. the option to generate partial threads on screws and rods as well.
...
I understand this.