Civil engineering feature implementation (Transportation Engineering)

[Joel_graff]

Just a note, I've done significant restructuring of the Trails codebase, just to improve code organization.

I've tested several functions and things seem to be working fine. If there are issues, please report them.

[thschrader]

Updated trails-wb, pivy-tracker, python-support.
Import works, meshing point-cloud works, no error reports.
(the ears need a little more love...)
Thanks

OS: Windows 10 (10.0)
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.22846 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: master
Hash: 1f46b72491a0008384a6db4f2615a656249f6f08
Python version: 3.6.8
Qt version: 5.12.1
Coin version: 4.0.0a
OCC version: 7.3.0
Locale: German/Germany (de_DE)

bunny_surface.JPG (52.09 KiB) Viewed 1523 times

EDIT:
bunny point-cloud meshed with CloudCompare. I think trails does a good job...

mesh_comparison.JPG (21.18 KiB) Viewed 1523 times

[HakanSeven12]

You are welcome

EDIT:
bunny point-cloud meshed with CloudCompare. I think trails does a good job...
mesh_comparison.JPG

The other programs apply interpolation. Some times it causes more distortion on model.

Just a note, I've done significant restructuring of the Trails codebase, just to improve code organization.

Maybe i can create a repo for Geomatics and you can add it as a submodule. Or we can use it as you did. What are you thinking about that?

[thschrader]

Aaaah....cool!

LIDAR_geodata.JPG (205.67 KiB) Viewed 1514 times

[HakanSeven12]

Looks good

[Joel_graff]

Maybe i can create a repo for Geomatics and you can add it as a submodule. Or we can use it as you did. What are you thinking about that?

I don't know that I have any great opinion on that. I'm using submodules so I can maintain code I use in other projects separately (like pivy_trackers).

The only issue with pulling geomatics out is that you rely on code that's part of the horizontal design portion of trails.

It may be better that they're maintained as separate repos (and maybe workbenches), but at this point I don't see a reason to bother unless you really feel compelled to do something.

[HakanSeven12]

You are right. We don't need to separate them.

[HakanSeven12]

Why you don't create a new thread for turns wb?

[Joel_graff]

Why you don't create a new thread for turns wb?

Right now, it's badly broken and not going anywhere, lol. Though I'm actually working on it at the moment to see if I can get things patched together. I haven't touched the code in nine months.

I might start a thread if I can get some time spent working on it, though.

[y_skific]

I'll take a closer look at what you developed. I've really only developed things just enough to work for my purposes, so I've no doubt there's a number of shortcomings. Always happy to have additional help, though I think this task might be a bit daunting for most folks to get involved.

All the same, whatever you feel like contributing,, I'm certainly open to it.

I have that code written in managed c# at the moment, i'll give a try to port it to a c++ dll.
I'm not sure of the success, because i'm quiet a newbie in c++.
I'll get back to you when i reach a first usable library, it might take some time ....