bernd wrote: ↑
Fri Aug 21, 2020 7:23 pm
it is not about the content of GeoDataWB. The content is fine. It is about the directory name. Why GeoDataWB? The name geoimport
would fit much better since it would describe what modules are inside. Furthermore it would not have upper character. We still are in a early version where such rename is just possible since these tools from trails are not yet widly used. Once more people use it such change is much more difficault.
I have had the same thoughts - there is a need for some cleanup on microelly's geodata code base, mostly in the form of naming conventions. filenames should be snake-case (lowercase and underscores), as well as some structural / path changes. But I haven't really decided on what might be a good approach.
The issue, really, is that Trails (as I've developed it) is largely separate from microelly and Hakan's work... and it needs to be better reflected in the file structure, I think.