Hello, I found a strange behavior of the chanfer function if you see in the image attacched the chanfer on the hole nr. 1 it's like I want , the chanfers in the holes 2,3 and 4 have a different form, the chanfer parameters used are the same, but the result are different.
Please let me know if I am making some mistakes
Thank you
Regards
Below my system info
OS: Windows 10 Version 2009
Word size of OS: 64-bit
Word size of FreeCAD: 64-bit
Version: 0.19.24267 +99 (Git)
Build type: Release
Branch: Branch_0.19.3
Hash: 6530e364184ce05ccff39501e175cf2237e6ee4b
Python version: 3.8.6+
Qt version: 5.15.2
Coin version: 4.0.1
OCC version: 7.5.3
Locale: C/Default (C)
used chanfer parameters
Strange Chamfer behavior
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Strange Chamfer behavior
- Attachments
-
- chanfer.jpg (30.99 KiB) Viewed 1899 times
Last edited by Kunda1 on Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed typo in thread title
Reason: fixed typo in thread title
Re: Strange Chanfer behavior
I'm pretty sure that this is only a visual effect of the projection. You can validate this assumption e.g. by looking at it in one of the standard projections (top, bottom, ...) or by cutting the part in the middle of the holes thus creating a section.
There is also a section view, but it often is not appreciated, because it shows the objects hollowed.
There is also a section view, but it often is not appreciated, because it shows the objects hollowed.
A Sketcher Lecture with in-depth information is available in English, auf Deutsch, en français, en español.
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9475
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Strange Chanfer behavior
You can select many edges for the same size in the same chamfer.
(File ?)
(File ?)
Re: Strange Chanfer behavior
Do chamfer individually, then use that red/blue arrows on right side of "Type" selection to correct FC if it not guessed right between which faces should be that 55 deg.
Re: Strange Chamfer behavior
Thank you to all, the suggestion of wieszak17 solve the issue, sorry but I didn't know the usage of the two arrows.
I remains the curiosity of why in the case of the hole 1 it works without the use of the arrows, while in the other 3 cases I had to change the direction of the chamfers.
Regards
I remains the curiosity of why in the case of the hole 1 it works without the use of the arrows, while in the other 3 cases I had to change the direction of the chamfers.
Regards
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9475
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Strange Chamfer behavior
I loaded the file for your analysis. please let me know.
- Attachments
-
- frontalino.FCStd
- (44.4 KiB) Downloaded 28 times
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9475
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: Strange Chamfer behavior
* 1st sketch is too complex
* NO zero-dimension : Sketcher_ConstrainVertical
* NO twice the same dimension : Sketcher_ConstrainEqual
* logical constraining (blue line in my sketch) Sketcher_ToggleConstruction
* ONE identical chamfer operation for4 holes
* NO zero-dimension : Sketcher_ConstrainVertical
* NO twice the same dimension : Sketcher_ConstrainEqual
* logical constraining (blue line in my sketch) Sketcher_ToggleConstruction
* ONE identical chamfer operation for4 holes
- Attachments
-
- frontalino_SHALM.FCStd
- (22 KiB) Downloaded 25 times
-
- Capture d’écran 2022-01-29 153457.png (44.47 KiB) Viewed 1572 times
-
- Capture d’écran 2022-01-29 153552.png (51.99 KiB) Viewed 1572 times
Re: Strange Chamfer behavior
Thank you a lot,
sorry for my inexperience and for my delay replay, I was in holiday
Regards
sorry for my inexperience and for my delay replay, I was in holiday
Regards