[Discussion] Coincident vs Point on Object
Forum rules
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Be nice to others! Read the FreeCAD code of conduct!
Re: [Discussion] Coincident vs Point on Object
Of course I know it is true, and that's why I said it was an exaggeration. And I guess you know damned well that point on edge does much more than coincidence. I didn't mean to be sarcastic, I tried to show you by using your own words, that it all boils down to opinions.
A Sketcher Lecture with in-depth information is available in English, auf Deutsch, en français, en español.
Re: [Discussion] Coincident vs Point on Object
Which is why we should just run a poll and see which opinion is preferred.
Regarding the fact that forum poll don't get enough votes, we can let it run for a long time and take the result into account only if vote count is over 50 or 100 or such.
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/FreeCadDevDiary
FreeCad Dev Diary channel:[/b] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGMTmJ ... NiPSSEhBHA
FreeCad Dev Diary channel:[/b] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGMTmJ ... NiPSSEhBHA
Re: [Discussion] Coincident vs Point on Object
For your continuing amusement here is a preview of a new type of complaint in the Help forum.
Caused by FreeCAD automagically selecting 1D constraint instead of 2D constraint when user just slightly missed the end of the vertical line.
Gene
Help! My fully constrained and fully connected sketch will not pad. I get an error message.
What's up with this idiotic program? Fusion, SolidWorks, etc. can deal with this just fine.
Caused by FreeCAD automagically selecting 1D constraint instead of 2D constraint when user just slightly missed the end of the vertical line.
Gene
dead topic
dead topic
I'll ask again, kindly, for the moderators to lock this thread.
I think it is a reasonable request as the originator of this forum discussion.
I'll ask again, kindly, for the moderators to lock this thread.
I think it is a reasonable request as the originator of this forum discussion.
Re: dead topic
It could have been if you hadn't defaced the thread before.
FYI, I just pushed a PR that could have allowed everyone to test coincident constrain merging within point-on-object one : https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/7478
Not sure anymore you deserve it...
- Shalmeneser
- Veteran
- Posts: 9560
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:04 am
- Location: Fr
Re: dead topic
IMHO, obelix79 has been respectuf to people and idea.
Re: dead topic
Being a moderator, and sometimes the one who locks topics, this is one of the worst reasons to lock a topic. Locking is done when the subject matter strays (it did not) or when the discussion becomes uncivil (it did not).
Gene
Re: dead topic
FreeCAD always deserves a good contribution!openBrain wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 3:43 pm FYI, I just pushed a PR that could have allowed everyone to test coincident constrain merging within point-on-object one : https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/7478
Not sure anymore you deserve it...
thanks!
follow my experiments on BIM modelling for architecture design
- adrianinsaval
- Veteran
- Posts: 5551
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Re: dead topic
can a mod or @obelisk79 please restore the title of the thread? Thanks for your work @openBrain I'll compile and test, it might be a good idea to make a snap build where the option is turned on by default and have people test it and give feedback.