adrianinsaval wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:59 pm
I wonder if incorrect usage would really increase if these are combined, I think the opposite might actually happen.
No it is then still false (not closed shape), even worse, because then you even have no visual feedback anymore (or better said, the false symbol feedback). Also the command symbol should match the symbol in the side panel. When it does not, it is inconsistent and misleading. And when it is all the same, good luck with error searching.
adrianinsaval wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:59 pm
click one side of the line, done, you can see the difference
This works only when the rest is not constraint, like the example i provided. But when many constraint already set, then this also do not work anymore. And when you are search errors in a sketch, then many constraints are already set.
adrianinsaval wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:59 pm
we have substitution for these kind of situation for end point tangency, why wouldn't we be able to have it for coincidence? (that's would be a nice feature idea btw). In general for most or everything that was mentioned, why is this acceptable for tangency/end point tangency, perpendicular/end point perpendicular and symmetry about line/point but not for coincidence/point on object?
To be honest, i am very unhappy with the tangency symbol/usecase. But since that case is not that often and when it is false constraint you have a missing point (vertex) or a clearly shifted point (vertex, since it is hopping while false constraining much wider then a straight line), then it is at least easy to catch.
Greetings
user1234