Do we have categories for other modules on the wiki already? If yes we really should do this!Kunda1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:55 pmCan we categorize all the FEM pages by adding them to a [[Category:FEM]] ?bernd wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 5:26 am I added a wiki page about all various kind of solvers. https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/FEM_Solver
I remember two disscussions I'm not able to find. One was about a solver wich could calculate penetrations like a cannonball into a wall, and the other was about a FEM solver developed in Čech republic. May be some other remembers these topics better than me.
FEA solver vs. FreeCAD FEM
Moderator: bernd
Forum rules
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
and Helpful information for the FEM forum
Re: supported Solver
Re: supported and not supported Solver
added. Do you remember the solver for analyzing bullets and stuff like this which gos into some other material.
- kkremitzki
- Veteran
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:52 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: supported Solver
Wow, now that's one that really needs to be in Debian Science!
Re: supported and not supported Solver
added them too ...
Re: supported Solver
This is currently off topic so I'll create another thread, reference this one and ping you. Thanksbernd wrote: ↑Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:07 pmDo we have categories for other modules on the wiki already? If yes we really should do this!Kunda1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:55 pmCan we categorize all the FEM pages by adding them to a [[Category:FEM]] ?bernd wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 5:26 am I added a wiki page about all various kind of solvers. https://www.freecadweb.org/wiki/FEM_Solver
I remember two disscussions I'm not able to find. One was about a solver wich could calculate penetrations like a cannonball into a wall, and the other was about a FEM solver developed in Čech republic. May be some other remembers these topics better than me.
New topic created @ https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=31424
Last edited by Kunda1 on Mon Oct 08, 2018 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Re: supported Solver
take note also about code saturne and su2, they are both for CFDsaso wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:57 am Thanks for the wiki bernd and nice to see the support for all this solvers. IMO in FOSS it is important to have a variety of choices. Here are a few more solvers for the possible future
code aster https://www.code-aster.org/
code saturne https://www.code-saturne.org
hermes (agros) http://www.hpfem.org/hermes/ (http://www.agros2d.org/)
nastran https://github.com/nasa/NASTRAN-95
su2 https://su2code.github.io/
Re: supported Solver
Yes, of course not It was not meant that all of it should be implemented by the end of the year, just to have a list where one can come back to later if there is a need or wish for something else.
Re: supported and not supported Solver
FYI, it may be good to being getting FreeCAD FEMs 3rd party deps more established in the package ecosystem:
Maybe this needs to be a separate thread?Alone you go faster. Together we go farther
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs
Please mark thread [Solved]
Want to contribute back to FC? Checkout:
'good first issues' | Open TODOs and FIXMEs | How to Help FreeCAD | How to report Bugs